Some people believe that it is good to share as much information
as possible in scientific research, business and the academic
world. Others believe that some information is too important or
too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
As sharing is happiness, especial exchanging academic information can give a tremendous impetus of human beings' civilization. However, some individuals do not share this view who say because the academic research endures long-term cycle to approach it preciously, these should not be shared without charge. This essay agree that information need to pay. This essay is going to discuss the both views firstly and secondly analyze why exchanging information freely is harmful for people's learning ability and enthusiasm.
Sharing people's information play an inadequate part in human beings' history. If people were not shared what they have approached information, civilization would never come up from the horizon across the entire world undoubtedly. The wisdom communicate what they thinking in the ancient age while people exchange their science widely since the Renaissance while individuals shipped their freights since the Industrial age, and today's Information age ascribes to the telecommunication. Therefore, the whole history of mankind is a story about exchange people's thinking, cargoes, science and technology.
However, the freedom and free sharing information can spoil the benefits of authors even destroying their creativity of the entire society. As the world approaches the Information age, the occupation is classified more detail than before every time, so both academic researcher and novel writer is kinds of career who depend on their skill to live. However, their works, such as novels, music scripts, research papers, and so on, mean those people's bread, house, bill. Provided their works continue to pirate, they will give up their creative career. The human beings' society have to embrace the dark age because authors, musicians, engineers, and scientific researchers are horsework to creativity. Thus, information should be protected, that is no authorizing copyright no sharing qualification.
This essay outweighs paying sharing against free sharing. Accessing knowledge or business freely can dispute people's learning enthusiasm and ability. First of all, if people can easily and freely access knowledge, they might not respect knowledge any more. Secondly, people might just download freely materials from the Internet, but they reluctant to learn. Thereby, the knowledge of human beings can not update, so mankind's progress will be stagnating.
To recapitulate, sharing information benefits human beings' development, but no authorized behavior can destroy the creativity of the whole society. Additionally, piracy make people lose the learning ability, resulting in that people have to embrace dark age.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
... can give a tremendous impetus of human beings civilization. However, some individuals...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 319, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'agrees'.
Suggestion: agrees
...ot be shared without charge. This essay agree that information need to pay. This essa...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 463, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nalyze why exchanging information freely is harmful for peoples learning ability ...
^^^
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...mation play an inadequate part in human beings history. If people were not shared what...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 562, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...ive up their creative career. The human beings society have to embrace the dark age be...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 53, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...ate, sharing information benefits human beings development, but no authorized behavior...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2256.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75510204082 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88026359338 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576530612245 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 689.4 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5185987202 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.428571429 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.80952380952 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229709108544 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722448861724 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478966651982 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133903223163 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578149855304 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.