You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The charts below show the percentage of monthly household income
spent on various items by two different groups in one European
country.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main
features, and making comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
This pie charts illustrate how the household of different income groups allocate their monthly revenue.
Overall, low-income families spend more salary on food and drinks than fuel bill, while rich people incurred maximum expenditure on recreation. Also, both high-income group and low income group spend relatively low proportion of income on clothes.
In the survey, nearly 28% of income is spent on food and drinks in high-income group, so it is clearly the largest percentage among all consuming items. This figure is twice than the high-income household. The fuel bill accounts for almost a quarter of low-income families' budget, coming to the second place, while this category is only 7% in high-income group.
In contrast about 23% of income is used for miscellaneous in high-income groups, which is 5% more than low-income group. In the high-income group, around 21% income is spent on recreational and cultural activities, occupying the largest fraction, whereas low-income families spend less than 11% of their wages on it. Additionally, high-income households allocate a larger proportion of income on transport(16%) and restaurant and hotels(12%) than low revenue families. In addition, both high-income and low income group spends only 6% and 5% income on clothing respectively, and therefore on this category the income spent is the least.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
... is only 7% in high-income group. In contrast about 23% of income is used for miscell...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, therefore, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1149.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47142857143 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95438104295 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2963444731 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.9 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0869083346428 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601288540458 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467642896188 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0923302375661 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057783172253 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.