You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between
1940 and 2040 in three different countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make
comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The line graph compares the percentage of older people having ages 65 and above living in USA, Sweden and Japan from 1940 to 2020. Overall, it can be seen that, despite some fluctuations, the total number of such individuals in all three countries had increased over time, but more significantly in Japan.
At the beginning of time frame, Japan had least number of elderly people, accounting to only 5%. However, after 2020, the country witnessed a drastic surge in the aged population, leaving the other countries behind. Hence, it finished off leading with over 25 seniors per 100 by 2040 altogether.
In contrast, USA and Sweden started off at higher levels as compared to Japan. Moreover, USA was at the top having a percentage slightly below 10, whilst Sweden landed a little below it. Nevertheless, both of them followed a fairly similar pattern for the majority of period. However, after 1990, slight change in trends occurred, the number of older individuals exceeded in Sweden, so much so, that it outnumbered USA and by 2020 it ended up securing second highest position after Japan, with approximately 25% elders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the least'.
Suggestion: had the least
... At the beginning of time frame, Japan had least number of elderly people, accounting to...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 453, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'second the highest'.
Suggestion: second the highest
...ed USA and by 2020 it ended up securing second highest position after Japan, with approximatel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05347593583 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6828829573 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.700534759358 0.547539520022 128% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8177571764 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0520211295097 0.215688989381 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0223788639681 0.103423049105 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0278724873444 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0429503003081 0.15604864568 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331510975488 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.