You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Underground Railways Systems
City
Date opened
Kilometres of route
Passengers per year
(in millions)
London
1863
394
775
Paris
1900
199
1191
Tokyo
1927
155
1927
Washington DC
1976
126
144
Kyoto
1981
11
45
Los Angeles
2001
28
50
You should write at least 150 words.
The table of data shows information regarding the underground railway system in terms of routes covered, passengers travelling annually, and the year the railway system initiated. The indicated information is for 6 cities ( London, Paris, Tokyo, Washington DC, Kyoto, and Los Angles).
Overall, London has the oldest railway line which was started at 1863, which covers maximum routes of 394 kilometers, and carries 3rd most more traveler's annually (775 millions). The recent railroad started by the year 2001 in Los angles, while this has the 2nd most least traveler's amount (50 millions) and as well as routes (28 kilometers).
The most busiest railway system noted in Tokyo with 1927 million passengers annually, which was inaugurated on 1927, while on comparison Kyoto is the least most busiest with only 45 millions passengers and this was opened by the year 1981.
And also, Kyoto remains to be the least covering underground railroad (11 kilometers). Further more, Paris is the 2nd most busiest with 1191 million passengers yearly, with covering routes of 199 kilometer and opened on 1900.
In conclusion, based on the kilometers of routes,the oldest underground railway network in London is the highest.
And according to the passenger reference Tokyo is the most busiest among 6 cities. The most least covering routes and least busiest underground railway network is Kyoto.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he indicated information is for 6 cities London, Paris, Tokyo, Washington DC, Kyo...
^^
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'more' (without 'most') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: more
...utes of 394 kilometers, and carries 3rd most more travelers annually 775 millions. The r...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'least' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: least
...1 in Los angles, while this has the 2nd most least travelers amount 50 millions and as wel...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'most the least'.
Suggestion: most the least
...1 in Los angles, while this has the 2nd most least travelers amount 50 millions and as wel...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 5, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'busiest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: busiest
...as well as routes 28 kilometers. The most busiest railway system noted in Tokyo with 1927...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 5, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'most the busiest'.
Suggestion: most the busiest
...as well as routes 28 kilometers. The most busiest railway system noted in Tokyo with 1927...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'busiest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: busiest
... while on comparison Kyoto is the least most busiest with only 45 millions passengers and th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 116, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'busiest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: busiest
...ometers. Further more, Paris is the 2nd most busiest with 1191 million passengers yearly, wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 194, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kilometer' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kilometers'.
Suggestion: kilometers
...ers yearly, with covering routes of 199 kilometer and opened on 1900. In conclusion, b...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 49, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...usion, based on the kilometers of routes,the oldest underground railway network in L...
^^^^
Line 9, column 55, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'busiest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: busiest
...to the passenger reference Tokyo is the most busiest among 6 cities. The most least covering...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 87, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'least' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: least
...is the most busiest among 6 cities. The most least covering routes and least busiest under...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 87, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'most the least'.
Suggestion: most the least
...is the most busiest among 6 cities. The most least covering routes and least busiest under...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 118, Rule ID: LEAST_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean 'least busy'?
Suggestion: least busy
...ies. The most least covering routes and least busiest underground railway network is Kyoto.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 118, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'least the busiest'.
Suggestion: least the busiest
...ies. The most least covering routes and least busiest underground railway network is Kyoto.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, regarding, so, well, while, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1164.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31506849315 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66052962419 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511415525114 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3919021703 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.4 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 15.0 1.69756097561 884% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123197159183 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613829702911 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553580595586 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0791335894854 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553349427225 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.