The Development of country is directly proportional to the development of transport system. It is clear from the fact, Most of the developed countries have fastest, easiest, cheapest and most preferred mode of transport for their citizens. When the question arises ,whether the government should fund more on railways or on roads?; people seem like to have different suggestions. But personally i agree investing on railways is best and helps in the improvement of the country. This essay will argue why government must fund more on railroad line instead of roads.
Train carries more goods and people when compared to buses, whereas they carry only very few. In the past 10 decades, car population have increased a lot which resulted in congestion on road. People find difficult to travel on road during the rush hours and end up regret for reaching their desired place late. The recent study on pollution report shows, 80% of air pollution is due to vehicles on road. Hence improvement of railway system than roads helps to decrease the pollution and also in the improvement of health among population.
Traders relay on railways networks for solid transportation. And also highway casualties are highly noted than railway casualties. Perhaps,The private cars and public buses may be suitable for short distance travels. But cannot be comfortable for long distance voyage. A Recent survey showed, Most of the citizens prefer train in order to save their valuable time on travelling. Therefore, Feasibly government must spend large amount of money on railway networks.
This essay argued about investment by government should primarily focus on the improvement of railway system. since they have to prioritize the requirements of the citizen. In my opinion, Invest on railroad is a prudent idea.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 265, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...their citizens. When the question arises ,whether the government should fund more ...
^^
Line 1, column 396, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...e different suggestions. But personally i agree investing on railways is best and...
^
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...r pollution is due to vehicles on road. Hence improvement of railway system than road...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 139, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , The
...y noted than railway casualties. Perhaps,The private cars and public buses may be su...
^^^^
Line 5, column 399, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... time on travelling. Therefore, Feasibly government must spend large amount of mo...
^^
Line 7, column 111, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Since
...s on the improvement of railway system. since they have to prioritize the requirement...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 111, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s on the improvement of railway system. since they have to prioritize the requirement...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, therefore, whereas, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 3.97073170732 529% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 965.302439024 157% => OK
No of words: 289.0 196.424390244 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2491349481 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78251041253 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 106.607317073 166% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612456747405 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 283.868780488 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 8.94146341463 212% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.2712851125 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.8421052632 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2105263158 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36842105263 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145413117936 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0424059903006 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479072649884 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.081336280924 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177726420056 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 40.7170731707 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.