2 weeks ago you bought a radio from a local branch of a well known chain of shops. It did not work properly. The shop took it back and said they would repair it. You have waited a week and still it is not ready.
Write a letter to the shop. In your letter
*say what has happened and how you feel
*ask them to explain why there has been such a delay
*ask the to repair the radio very soon or supply you with a new radio
Dear Sir or Madam,
I writing to you with regards to my radio which I bought and gave to you on warranty 2 weeks ago.
At the beginning I would like to mention that I am happy about the service and product you are provide in you stores.
However, I am disappointed about the one situation related to the warranty service that you are providing. It has already been two weeks that you holding my radio on warranty and I did not get any notice when it is going to be fixed.
I would like to know what is happening with my radio and when it is going to be repaired?
In case you need more than 2 weeks to repair the radio I demand to replace my radio with brand new model. I cannot wait any more longer because I am going to Spain for my vacation and I need it for that trip.
I look forward to hearing from you
Your faithful,
Tomasz Zawadzki
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: I_AM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I am'?
Suggestion: I am
Dear Sir or Madam, I writing to you with regards to my radio...
^
Line 7, column 96, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'provided'.
Suggestion: provided
...y about the service and product you are provide in you stores. However, I am disappo...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 125, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'longer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: longer
...with brand new model. I cannot wait any more longer because I am going to Spain for my vaca...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 23, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to hearing from you Your faithful, Tomasz Zawadzki
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 4.92783505155 101% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 32.9175257732 103% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 26.3917525773 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 707.0 937.175257732 75% => OK
No of words: 166.0 206.0 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.25903614458 4.54256449028 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.78020617076 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21427952663 2.54303337028 87% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 127.690721649 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536144578313 0.622605031667 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 217.8 290.88556701 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.13402061856 77% => OK
Article: 0.0 0.824742268041 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 16.3205200591 44.8134815571 36% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.375 76.5299724578 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 16.8248392259 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.625 4.34317383033 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.29896907216 140% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 2.54639175258 157% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226947849577 0.216113520407 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106534989373 0.0766984524023 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543642233721 0.0603063233224 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127466214756 0.12726935374 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473090966334 0.0580467560999 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 8.37731958763 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 70.7449484536 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 7.45979381443 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.43 8.71597938144 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 7.59969072165 92% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 41.2886597938 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 8.62886597938 104% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.