Are famous people treated unfairly by the media? Should they be given more privacy, or is the price of their fame an invasion into their private life?Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
renowned personalities as their role model and tend to follow them wherever possible. However, complaints of popular personalities such as actors and sportsmen regarding breach of their privacy, are a matter of concern. In my opinion, every individual irrespective of his fame and status has a right to lead a life in their way.
On one hand, famous people, who gain fame from the public, including media persons, are responsible to pay back to them. Not only it is the love of the common people who made them stand out, but also the love of media which provided them a platform to showcase their skills. For instance, many actors get a boost in their carrier, after being interviewed by a media spokesperson. Furthermore, people start considering them as an inspiration and want to emulate them. To illustrate, many brands higher top actresses, as this increases their sales by attracting fans and followers.
On the other hand, people forget that popular personalities have worked very hard to reach their current stature, and they should not be expected to entertain them all the time. Firstly, the private life of every person is reserved for them, one should not invade without permission. Secondly, people earn mastery of their fields through their diligence, determination, and perseverance, and not because of mass-media. To Illustrate, Sachin Tendulkar, the famous cricketer, was considered as God of cricket, due to his skills and determination, and not due to people.
To conclude, although famous personalities should conduct morally in public, nevertheless, they should not be expected to be always answerable. Moreover, they should always be approached on approval.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Renowned
renowned personalities as their role model and t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 200, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hould always be approached on approval.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, for instance, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.48453608247 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 4.92783505155 101% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 5.05154639175 218% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 32.9175257732 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 26.3917525773 152% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.85567010309 130% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 937.175257732 151% => OK
No of words: 269.0 206.0 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26394052045 4.54256449028 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.78020617076 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00572276543 2.54303337028 118% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 127.690721649 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591078066914 0.622605031667 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.9 290.88556701 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.463917525773 1078% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 1.44329896907 485% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6804123711 110% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8108945746 44.8134815571 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.142857143 76.5299724578 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 16.8248392259 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7857142857 4.34317383033 271% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 7.41237113402 148% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282720861745 0.216113520407 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964031960876 0.0766984524023 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404360584695 0.0603063233224 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168749257911 0.12726935374 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0164615163987 0.0580467560999 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 8.37731958763 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 70.7449484536 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 7.45979381443 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 8.71597938144 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 7.59969072165 118% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 41.2886597938 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.