The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given chart depicts the percentage of British citizens contributing money towards charity during 1990 and 2010, grouped by age.
There are five age groups out of which only two increased their presence in the charity from 1990 to 2010, which were 51-65 years and over 65 years. Out of the total population of these groups, 35% and 32% respectively gave to charity in 1990 which increased to 39% and 35% respectively in 2010. The age section of 18-25 years saw the biggest dip in the percentage of people contributing to charity from 17% to a mere 6%.
The percentage of persons in the age group 26-35 and 36-50 giving money to charity decreased from 31% and 42% in 1990 to 24% and 35% in 2010. The maximum increase in the proportion of people lending to charity was seen in age group 51-65, which upped their numbers from 35% in 1990 to 39% in 2010.
So, to conclude, the proportion of people contributing to charity decreased in three out of five age sects mentioned from what it was in 1990 to 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...and 42% in 1990 to 24% and 35% in 2010. The maximum increase in the proportion of p...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.48453608247 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 32.9175257732 12% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 26.3917525773 163% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.85567010309 130% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 833.0 937.175257732 89% => OK
No of words: 182.0 206.0 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57692307692 4.54256449028 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.78020617076 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47790014564 2.54303337028 97% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 127.690721649 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467032967033 0.622605031667 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 228.6 290.88556701 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 16.3608247423 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 9.96729345286 44.8134815571 22% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 119.0 76.5299724578 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 16.8248392259 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 4.34317383033 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.94845360825 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242478811918 0.216113520407 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138059716711 0.0766984524023 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547838686062 0.0603063233224 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175589455039 0.12726935374 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439444392115 0.0580467560999 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 8.37731958763 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 70.7449484536 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 7.45979381443 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 8.71597938144 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 7.59969072165 92% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 41.2886597938 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 8.62886597938 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 8.54432989691 145% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.