Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
The people of any city have differing views when the subject of enforcing of laws for proper and timely waste disposal is considered. I believe that laws may work to an extent, but having adequate garbage management sites is more important than that.
People tend to throw their domestic waste in the streets or in a landfill. They feel that maintaining garbage bins and then separating wet and dry waste is a tiresome activity. This is leading to big piles of garbage in many cities which are increasing in number. Such sites have become a breeding ground for many disease carrying insects and animals. If everyone gets rid of their waste products, our cities would become a much cleaner and healthier place to live.
If recycling becomes a legal requirement, the number of people adopting that practice will surely increase. There are some people who act only if they are bound by the law to do so. On the contrary, there are also those people who understand their civic duties without the need of laws, and only need the right facilities to be in place. It may sound city or country specific, but waste management is a prominent issue in several big cities in the world. This is primarily due to lack of proper facilities in the metros. Governments should plan to make more recycling units near residential areas so that people do not have a reason to loiter the streets.
So to conclude, I believe that creation of such laws in the interest of protection of environment and ultimately our well-being, is very necessary along with the availability of proper arrangements for it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 310, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun disease seems to be countable; consider using: 'many diseases'.
Suggestion: many diseases
...sites have become a breeding ground for many disease carrying insects and animals. If everyo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, well, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1317.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80656934307 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62468648943 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583941605839 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9328313294 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0714285714 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64285714286 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292382266599 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910358236136 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736777312601 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146534908802 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102759314426 0.056905535591 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.