The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wals between 1918 and 2011
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Household accommodation has been categorized based on owned and rented for England and Wales from 1918 and 2011 in the given chart. From 1961 the changes are shown in 10 years interval till 2011, before that three other years are mentioned which are 1918 then 21 years later, starting of the second world war 1939 ad then 1953.
The first thing noticed here is that owned accommodation faced an upward slope till 2001 and rented accommodation experienced an downward slope till 2001. But in 2011 both the process had an change in their trend in its overall household contribution. It is seen that in 1971 the percentage constituents of both types of households were same.
From the beginning people of England and Wales had the tendency of living in rented house, with time which declined indicating that people of these countries preferred owning home and as a result they worked towards it and over the time of hundred years they shifted the dynamics.
There were no changes during 1939 to 1953 in the living condition of people, this synchronizes with the fact that after world war it took some time for people to focus on their basic needs and overcome the economic impact of the war. However in 2011 the trend is seen to be set in opposite direction.
In sum it can be said, the preference of housing accommodation indicates a lot of socio-economic condition of the people living in that country the graph presented gave a lot of information regarding choices in coherence with economic condition for 2 countries over almost a century.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...01 and rented accommodation experienced an downward slope till 2001. But in 2011 b...
^^
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... 2001. But in 2011 both the process had an change in their trend in its overall ho...
^^
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...vercome the economic impact of the war. However in 2011 the trend is seen to be set in ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, then, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.48453608247 147% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.03092783505 264% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 32.9175257732 52% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 26.3917525773 178% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.85567010309 311% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1288.0 937.175257732 137% => OK
No of words: 265.0 206.0 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86037735849 4.54256449028 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.78020617076 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65813099327 2.54303337028 105% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 127.690721649 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550943396226 0.622605031667 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 380.7 290.88556701 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 16.3608247423 177% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.4105616937 44.8134815571 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.111111111 76.5299724578 187% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4444444444 16.8248392259 175% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 4.34317383033 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 7.41237113402 13% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.94845360825 152% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157029900034 0.216113520407 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743287166919 0.0766984524023 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762254994891 0.0603063233224 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0788906559809 0.12726935374 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558922859631 0.0580467560999 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 8.37731958763 193% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 70.7449484536 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 7.45979381443 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 8.71597938144 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 7.59969072165 111% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 41.2886597938 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 8.62886597938 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 8.54432989691 159% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 8.15463917526 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.