Dudos' extinction
The author of the reading and the lecturer both are about reasons for extinction of the bird dudo. The author suggests that the human hunting was the main reasons for the dudo’s extinction whereas the lecturer states there are some other factors responsible for the extinction of bird dudo. The lecturer has effectively challenged the main idea of the reading passage by providing cogent reasons with examples.
First of all, according to the author, human hunting is the main reason for the extinction of the of dudo. Author states one reason for the dodo fell victim of hunting is flightless. However, the lecturer has disputes this point. Lecture argues that the taste of the dudo was horrible and there were so many other species available so as to hunt. Hence, he mentions why would people hunt horrible tasting dudo if there were other species of birds who taste much more better than dudo.
Second, the reading passage suggests that unusual friendliness is another reason that which made people to hunt them. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this claim in the passage. He feels that friendliness did not mean they were never vulnerable to the people. He adds, it was not that much easy to attack dudo of that size. IN addition, lecture states that the actual reason of their extinction was dudos were having problem in re population which results their extinction.
Finally, the author of the passage claims evidences found in the cave of Europe showed dudos were hunted by the people. On other hand, the lecturer disagree with this point in the passage. She believes the remains of the dudo found in the caves of Europe were actually left by the some other predators not human. In addition she thinks loss of habitats was the main reason for their extinction.
In conclusion, although the author and the lecturer both were about extinction of bird dudo in seventeenth century, the lecture has casted doubt on the main idea of the passage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 297, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nsible for the extinction of bird dudo. The lecturer has effectively challenged the...
^^^
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...re were so many other species available so as to hunt. Hence, he mentions why would peop...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 463, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...e other species of birds who taste much more better than dudo. Second, the reading passa...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 282, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...ves of Europe were actually left by the some other predators not human. In addition ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 317, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
... the some other predators not human. In addition she thinks loss of habitats was the mai...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, whereas, as to, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.48453608247 227% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 5.05154639175 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.03092783505 363% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 32.9175257732 67% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 26.3917525773 159% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.85567010309 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 937.175257732 175% => OK
No of words: 331.0 206.0 161% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94561933535 4.54256449028 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 3.78020617076 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42474939817 2.54303337028 95% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 127.690721649 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.441087613293 0.622605031667 71% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 500.4 290.88556701 172% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.13402061856 55% => OK
Article: 9.0 0.824742268041 1091% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 12.6804123711 142% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 16.3608247423 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4123500103 44.8134815571 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9444444444 76.5299724578 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3888888889 16.8248392259 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 4.34317383033 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 2.54639175258 196% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.49484536082 535% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283746871156 0.216113520407 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956942931005 0.0766984524023 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112784692126 0.0603063233224 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178088919237 0.12726935374 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860484167902 0.0580467560999 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 8.37731958763 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 70.7449484536 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 7.45979381443 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 8.71597938144 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 7.59969072165 103% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 41.2886597938 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 8.54432989691 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.