Although it is sometimes thought that the world economy is greatly benefited by the globalization, others think we should always remember it was also disadvantaging at many fronts. In my opinion, I consider that it impacted positively by strengthening the economy and changing the general perspectives.
On the one hand, some people think that globalization helped the world economy to boom and I agree. In other words, when globalization happened countries opened up for foreign investments and let the foreign company set up their business on their own soil which consequently, resulted in the creation of high paying jobs. For example, after globalization, demand engineers and managers saw a sharp increase all over the world. Many families were pulled out of poverty and purchasing power also increased which, therefore, helped GDP to grow estimated at least two folds. Furthermore, globalization resulted in the free flow of ideas and widened the perspective of people by the introduction of new learning.
On the other hand, it is often believed that globalization also had downsides. People in some countries started forgetting their own customs and tradition and, started value other's. This had a consequence of perishing of local languages which is a threat to the nation's plight and tourism. For instance, more than half of the schools in India are English medium. Which resulted in lower knowledge of local languages. Another reason why it was considered disadvantageous is that it hurt the local businesses. The small local business was in direct competition global giants, which was not at all fair to them.
In conclusion, despite people having different views, I believe that globalization fueled the economies worldwide and broadened the minds of the general population.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 709, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le by the introduction of new learning. On the other hand, it is often believed ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 263, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ocal languages which is a threat to the nations plight and tourism. For instance, more ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...he schools in India are English medium. Which resulted in lower knowledge of local la...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, if, so, then, therefore, at least, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.48453608247 147% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 5.05154639175 198% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.03092783505 396% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 32.9175257732 67% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 26.3917525773 140% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.85567010309 363% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 937.175257732 162% => OK
No of words: 282.0 206.0 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37943262411 4.54256449028 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.78020617076 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08182143529 2.54303337028 121% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 127.690721649 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595744680851 0.622605031667 96% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 290.88556701 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.13402061856 44% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 1.44329896907 485% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6804123711 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 16.3608247423 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8252262107 44.8134815571 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.133333333 76.5299724578 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 16.8248392259 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5333333333 4.34317383033 243% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.49484536082 334% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107109740405 0.216113520407 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0358026836779 0.0766984524023 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384788574944 0.0603063233224 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0727332109273 0.12726935374 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034454854623 0.0580467560999 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 8.37731958763 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 70.7449484536 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 7.45979381443 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 8.71597938144 160% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 7.59969072165 116% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 41.2886597938 184% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 8.62886597938 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 8.54432989691 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.