The growth of online shopping will one day lead to all shops in towns and cities closing.
Do you agree or disagree?
Increasing online shopping has caused downfall in physical stores. In my opinion, never can a website pull down a shop but rather promote the growth of trade in the country, thereby improve standard of living.
On the one hand, people visiting a shop to buy any product can touch, feel, check the quality. Even though, travel to the shop is overhead there is an excitement to head to the store to get home things we wish. For example consider buying clothes there are hundreds of options with regards to colors, quality of materials, a physical check is better than looks which we fall for. There is always a disappointment when a shipped product does not mark satisfaction. Another example, buy a car after a trial drive.
Moreover, there are few disadvantages with website based shopping where shipping is not guaranteed of damages associated with it, in addition to that misplaced delivery. Furthermore, once the items are misplaced, a customer goes through a lot of procedure even if, the trading ethics is followed. For instance, contacting a customer service is burdensome as it needs a lot of information transferred and refunding takes time along with reordering, which kills the excitement of a product arrival. In addition to this, feedback a seller gets for every purchase, motivates them for their survival.
On the other hand, online shopping encourages entrepreneurs irrespective of their size. Although the initial investment is negligible, profit earned is high. For instance, pre-ordering option for high investing products earn lesser loss compared to a store that has already managed to sell a complete item. However, we need not travel miles to buy from craftsmen who trade from the other part of the globe.
In conclusion, a website can never replace the fondness of the shops. By the end of the day what matters is the customer satisfaction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Increasing online shopping has caused do...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., thereby improve standard of living. On the one hand, people visiting a shop ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ample, buy a car after a trial drive. Moreover, there are few disadvantages wi...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e, motivates them for their survival. On the other hand, online shopping encou...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ade from the other part of the globe. In conclusion, a website can never repla...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.48453608247 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 4.92783505155 81% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 5.05154639175 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 32.9175257732 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 26.3917525773 148% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.85567010309 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 937.175257732 167% => OK
No of words: 308.0 206.0 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07792207792 4.54256449028 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 3.78020617076 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84988748213 2.54303337028 112% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 127.690721649 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61038961039 0.622605031667 98% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 290.88556701 167% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 1.44329896907 485% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6804123711 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 16.3608247423 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4500520661 44.8134815571 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 76.5299724578 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1176470588 16.8248392259 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11764705882 4.34317383033 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 2.54639175258 196% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.49484536082 334% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117663257292 0.216113520407 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0399987159776 0.0766984524023 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534274625152 0.0603063233224 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0696836791081 0.12726935374 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493242322506 0.0580467560999 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 8.37731958763 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 70.7449484536 75% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 7.45979381443 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 8.71597938144 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 7.59969072165 119% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 41.2886597938 213% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 8.62886597938 104% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 8.54432989691 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.