Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Watching movies on mobile phones or an iPad is sufficient than going to the theaters is thought by a few. However, the rest of them say a complete entertainment is experienced when seen on a big screen. In my opinion, screen sizes choice decision is based on the category of movies, the target audience and comfort.
On the one hand, some shows can be watched in your bed or on the couch, at your own comfort rather than choosing a theater. There are numerous software applications that can easily be installed in our devices where movies are watched at affordable subscription rates, based on different categories and languages with subtitles enabled with powerful “pause and play” option which is not available in a crowded movie house. High volume web-series, drama, short films, movies are played in a small display. For example, an adult can view a film privately, which are rated specifically for them.
On the other hand, big budgeted movies with advanced visual and sound effects are a treat when watched with friends and family. Nevertheless, the cinema hall creates a leisurely mood with the cheering crowd and the creative art appreciated. Fun is multifold today, as the screens are part of shopping malls.
Apparently, it is expensive when we need to watch multiple flicks, although, theaters do not compromise with the entertainment factor. Moreover, only new movies are played in the movie hall, but the ones dated back decades or more can be watched on the phones. For instance, an Indian regional blockbuster, does not get released at a Korean theater, but are available at reasonable costs on the internet.
In conclusion, different factors matter the place where a film is watched, therefore entertainment is the ultimate fun quotient.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09965635739 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84135298859 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618556701031 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7623809503 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2142857143 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154674848338 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046876742392 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375916967081 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0722068847494 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325602820274 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.