Many people work long hours, leaving very little time for leisure activities. Does this situation has more advantages or disadvantages?
Nowadays, a lot of people give priority to their professional life instead of thinking about social life concurrently. They spend more time on their work rather than a little me time. This essay will discuss the pros and cons of longer working hours.
In order to survive in a cutthroat competition, people tend to work for longer hours to get the benefit of satisfactory appraisal and bonus. As the world is changing rapidly it is necessary to cope up with the dynamic environment and that is only possible by spending more time to work to remain update and learning as much as possible. For instance, one can fulfil his dreams by spending crucial time in potential task. Advocate needs to be updated all the time because of persistently change in law and regulations. And also, it is a well-known fact that legends do not pass their time in unproductive activities.
Alternatively, longer working hours has more disadvantages as it results in the imbalance of work and social life. If people do not have time to relax there would be a lot of negative consequences on their health as these activities not only keep the mind refresh but also provide energy. Meditation, hanging out with friends, having a fruitful time with family help to develop their bond as well as social life stronger. Lack of time for themselves make the person frustrated and sometimes result in belligerent behaviour. Apart from following the monotonous routine, it is extremely necessary to take out some relief hours.
To recapitulate, longer working hours help to achieve the desired objective and leads to betterment as well. As a contradiction of sorts, it is equally essential to take out spare hours from busy working schedule in order to balance personal as well as professional life. To be precise, the advantages of leisure activities outweigh its disadvantages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, apart from, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 4.92783505155 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 5.05154639175 198% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 32.9175257732 58% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 26.3917525773 186% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.85567010309 182% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 937.175257732 168% => OK
No of words: 309.0 206.0 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08737864078 4.54256449028 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 3.78020617076 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92115255442 2.54303337028 115% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 127.690721649 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569579288026 0.622605031667 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 497.7 290.88556701 171% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.13402061856 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6804123711 126% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5183494116 44.8134815571 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.25 76.5299724578 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3125 16.8248392259 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8125 4.34317383033 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 7.41237113402 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.49484536082 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24488515045 0.216113520407 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787963696972 0.0766984524023 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496390346938 0.0603063233224 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14625612254 0.12726935374 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440641653551 0.0580467560999 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 8.37731958763 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 70.7449484536 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 7.45979381443 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 8.71597938144 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 7.59969072165 113% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 41.2886597938 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.