mentally people shoulde be paid hugh
: it is usually argued that highly qualified people as well people doing difficult physical jobs should be renumerated equally. There are two factor that forced pay more to people having to focus more mentally on the jobs namely their hard work as well as shorter span of earning and their contribution to give convenience to the society
The first and foremost reason is that they work hard during their young age and also have to develop punctuality and perseverance to get higher qualification. Apart from generating these habits, People with higher education often pay exorbitantly high fees and sometimes take loans which they have to return later in life. For instance, if the individual is keen to become doctor by profession then he will have to spend around approximately 20 lakh Indian rupees which is not easy task.
Another reason carrying paramount significance is that people with high academics not only benefit themselves but also indirectly to the society. Their inventions and strategies help the society to progress. For instance, who has not heard the invention of mark Zuckerberg founder of Facebook whose invention has transformed the entire world into global village and facilitated the personal and business-related communication among people living in far flung areas. In Addition to this, more academically strong people have shorter earning span as compared to people with less education because they start earning late in the life
In conclusion, Although people with less qualification also work hard but paying high to people with high qualification cannot be ignored because of their benefit to the other people as well as motivation received by others from them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'factors'?
Suggestion: factors
... be renumerated equally. There are two factor that forced pay more to people having ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'factor' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'factors'.
Suggestion: factors
... be renumerated equally. There are two factor that forced pay more to people having ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or that forced pay more to people having to focus more mentally on the jobs namel...
^^
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tally on the jobs namely their hard work as well as shorter span of earning and t...
^^
Line 1, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ution to give convenience to the society The first and foremost reason is that th...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the individual is keen to become doctor by profession then he will have to spen...
^^
Line 3, column 395, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is keen to become doctor by profession then he will have to spend around approx...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, well, apart from, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 4.92783505155 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 5.05154639175 198% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.03092783505 264% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 32.9175257732 55% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 26.3917525773 140% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 3.85567010309 415% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1438.0 937.175257732 153% => OK
No of words: 271.0 206.0 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30627306273 4.54256449028 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.78020617076 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81328564575 2.54303337028 111% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 127.690721649 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594095940959 0.622605031667 95% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 290.88556701 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.41237113402 120% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 16.3608247423 202% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 113.688651039 44.8134815571 254% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 179.75 76.5299724578 235% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 33.875 16.8248392259 201% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 12.75 4.34317383033 294% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 2.54639175258 275% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.49484536082 268% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184846266618 0.216113520407 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766939939943 0.0766984524023 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081124671896 0.0603063233224 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121358601292 0.12726935374 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716882461839 0.0580467560999 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.5 8.37731958763 245% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 70.7449484536 42% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 3.82989690722 292% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 7.45979381443 232% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.11 8.71597938144 162% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 7.59969072165 123% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 41.2886597938 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 8.62886597938 232% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 15.2 8.54432989691 178% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 8.15463917526 258% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.