Some scientists think that computers will soon become more intelligent than humans. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is often thought by scientist that the intelligence of computer will be seen more as compared to human beings in the upcoming days. I disagree with this viewpoint as computers operates on the basis of preprogrammed instruction given by intelligent human beings
First and foremost reason is that computers do not have brain and work on the basis of pre-provided instruction. The algorithm which helps the computers to provide specific results are generated by software developers For example, the algorithm to multiple the two number is developed by the software engineer Eastin pristine initially. Moreover, talented Human brain is like instrument which give capability to computer deliver the results accurately and efficiently
The second vivid reason is that the operation of the computer usually depends upon the programming done by professionals. Therefore, the computers are effective for doing repetitive tasks and can never become more intelligent than human beings as they have not ability to change the method of doing the work as per the circumstances. For instance, in my workplace there was computer which was guiding the robots to go to different directions to collect the orders unfortunately it collided with the forklift as it could not sense the presence of something on floor and resumed its operations
In conclusion, computers can never have edge over human brain in terms of intelligence as computer do not have thinking power and rely solely on the backend algorithms.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...elligence of computer will be seen more as compared to human beings in the upcomin...
^^
Line 2, column 469, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r the results accurately and efficiently The second vivid reason is that the oper...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 389, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in my workplace there was computer which was guiding the robots to go to differ...
^^
Line 4, column 422, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r which was guiding the robots to go to different directions to collect the orde...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1265.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 238.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31512605042 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99667035053 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 16.0721442886 37% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 20.2975951904 192% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.6319635448 49.4020404114 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 210.833333333 106.682146367 198% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.6666666667 20.7667163134 191% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.0 7.06120827912 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27908326405 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142427598496 0.084324248473 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738695199985 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171839553509 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732256455391 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.5 13.0946893788 179% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.43 50.2224549098 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.7 11.3001002004 174% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.17 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.1190380762 174% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.