Mind Challenges in the Modern World
Over the last decades the unprecedented changes have happened in the field of education and self-developing. Approximately 30 years ago there were either just schools and universities for getting educated in certain fields or self-educated books which by the way were not socially recognized to be a proper source of information. Nonetheless, the briefest reflect on the modern world reveals significant modifications that have happened due to the invention of the Internet. Were it not for Internet, there were not a blizzard of opportunities opened for us – from listening to the bloggers about their own experience and getting advice to getting high-leveled education from the top-universities of the world.
Undoubtedly, never in the recorded history have the opportunities in different spheres been achievable as they are today. The free access to researches, polling material etc; opportunities to connect with people over the world which have different life history, experience and knowledges; ability to catch up with all innovations not even leaving your house which make possibly for disable people to life a full-life – all these have already been our reality. To illustrate the instance, take a close look at one of the online platforms for educating, Edx. Here there can be found courses from ancient history, culture to high-progressive ones concerning bio-engineering and mathematical modeling of human’s organs. From Microsoft to MIT, all global companies and universities require just registration for being involved in these breath-taking chances. However, while one may be absolutely convinced that it is in fact a case, there have left skeptics who question the endless capacity of online education.
Having analyzed all abovementioned prons the opposition points out at the obstacles with self-discipline among the online participants, questions their ability to cover material from books not from the interaction with cases. The lucid example of it would be a video “The Challenges of Studying From Books Only” in which the author highlights the issues of memorizing the material and loosing your critical thinking over attempts to cover a huge amount of data. Whereas these cons and above pointed up cons are inevitably rising in this sphere, the situation could be ameliorated - actually it is already in the process of improving – through using a lot of interactive classes with opportunity to act in very near-to-real situations; online schedules and motivations in form of video, conference-calls from teaches, other students and graduated ones and though online testing.
In conclusion, it could be easily estimated that the current time is the time of modifications, progression and further movement. Also, there have been left a number of challenges for us, there is no need to retreat to the luddite in the attitude to innovation, including the online education, but rather than to embrace the positive posture to them and to be aware of possible changes in any sphere.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 712, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...from the top-universities of the world. Undoubtedly, never in the recorded histo...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1014, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e endless capacity of online education. Having analyzed all abovementioned prons...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, look, may, nonetheless, so, whereas, while, in conclusion, in fact, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 7.48453608247 281% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 4.92783505155 122% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 5.05154639175 297% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.03092783505 264% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 32.9175257732 64% => OK
Preposition: 82.0 26.3917525773 311% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 17.0 3.85567010309 441% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2559.0 937.175257732 273% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 471.0 206.0 229% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43312101911 4.54256449028 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 3.78020617076 123% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2183639963 2.54303337028 127% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 127.690721649 209% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566878980892 0.622605031667 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 819.0 290.88556701 282% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.41237113402 120% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6804123711 118% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 16.3608247423 189% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.3073924174 44.8134815571 197% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.6 76.5299724578 223% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 31.4 16.8248392259 187% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 4.34317383033 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 7.41237113402 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0675365281748 0.216113520407 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0232906357945 0.0766984524023 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436204795374 0.0603063233224 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0402145241073 0.12726935374 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232835174385 0.0580467560999 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 8.37731958763 236% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 70.7449484536 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 3.82989690722 339% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 7.45979381443 223% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.81 8.71597938144 170% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 7.59969072165 133% => OK
difficult_words: 147.0 41.2886597938 356% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 8.62886597938 185% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 8.54432989691 169% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 8.15463917526 184% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.