The reading asserts that some methods should be proposed to solve the issue of decreasing frug populations and all of them are useful and pragmatic. The lecturer, however, finds the idea dubious and casts doubts on the reasons proposed by the reading passage.
First of all, the author argues that establishing some laws forbidding the farmers from using harmful and poisonous pesticides near sensitive frog populations can save frog specie's lives. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that diminishing in the amount of baneful pesticides can not be practical and economical since by diminishing in the amount of baneful pesticides, we are declining farmer's crop and also we loss some crops which cause a lot of disadvantages for global food supply.
Furthermore, the reading holds the idea that fungus which has spread around the world incites frogs to dead and we should use some anti fungal medication to kill that fungus. In contrast, the professor dismisses this idea due to the fact that we should use this treatment for all of the frog which is so expensive and it will not work for frog's offspring, so we should use this treatment again for their children which make it very convoluted.
Finally, the reading asserts that we should protect from water inhabitants such as lakes and marsh which has terminated by humans . On the contrary, the speaker dismisses this idea due to the fact that global warming cause a lot of damage in frog's habitats and by hampering human's activities we can not save frogs population.
The reading asserts that some methods should be proposed to solve the issue of decreasing frug populations and all of them are useful and pragmatic. The lecturer, however, finds the idea dubious and casts doubts on the reasons proposed by the reading passage.
First of all, the author argues that establishing some laws forbidding the farmers from using harmful and poisonous pesticides near sensitive frog populations can save frog specie's lives. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that diminishing in the amount of baneful pesticides can not be practical and economical since by diminishing in the amount of baneful pesticides, we are declining farmer's crop and also we loss some crops which cause a lot of disadvantages for global food supply.
Furthermore, the reading holds the idea that fungus which has spread around the world incites frogs to dead and we should use some anti fungal medication to kill that fungus. In contrast, the professor dismisses this idea due to the fact that we should use this treatment for all of the frog which is so expensive and it will not work for frog's offspring, so we should use this treatment again for their children which make it very convoluted.
Finally, the reading asserts that we should protect from water inhabitants such as lakes and marsh which has terminated by humans . On the contrary, the speaker dismisses this idea due to the fact that global warming cause a lot of damage in frog's habitats and by hampering human's activities we can not save frogs population.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...asons proposed by the reading passage. First of all, the author argues that est...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... disadvantages for global food supply. Furthermore, the reading holds the idea ...
^^^
Line 3, column 48, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hermore, the reading holds the idea that fungus which has spread around the world...
^^
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dismisses this idea due to the fact that we should use this treatment for all of ...
^^
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... that we should use this treatment for all of the frog which is so expensive and it will ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hildren which make it very convoluted. Finally, the reading asserts that we sho...
^^^
Line 4, column 133, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...and marsh which has terminated by humans . On the contrary, the speaker dismisses ...
^^
Line 4, column 283, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n frogs habitats and by hampering humans activities we can not save frogs populat...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, so, in contrast, such as, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 4.92783505155 183% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 5.05154639175 198% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 3.03092783505 429% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 32.9175257732 70% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 26.3917525773 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1275.0 937.175257732 136% => OK
No of words: 256.0 206.0 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98046875 4.54256449028 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.78020617076 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64869389372 2.54303337028 104% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 127.690721649 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53125 0.622605031667 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 387.0 290.88556701 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 8.0 0.824742268041 970% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 16.3608247423 196% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.072255192 44.8134815571 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.375 76.5299724578 208% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 32.0 16.8248392259 190% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.875 4.34317383033 319% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 2.54639175258 314% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.49484536082 334% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327193298751 0.216113520407 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187031252348 0.0766984524023 244% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.203563850908 0.0603063233224 338% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264930323223 0.12726935374 208% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.294137665041 0.0580467560999 507% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 8.37731958763 215% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 70.7449484536 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 3.82989690722 292% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 7.45979381443 196% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 8.71597938144 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 7.59969072165 116% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 41.2886597938 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 8.62886597938 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 8.54432989691 173% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 8.15463917526 184% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.