Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.
Write at least 250 words.
With the flourishing development of life, opinion has divided on whether or not scientific study would be implemented and managed via the governments or individual associations. Notwithstanding, the idea that banning the latter in this field is entirely against my belief.
Scientific experiments likely require an enormous amount of money, which would accounted for billions, should be under control of private companies by two main reasons. Firstly and possible reason is that they have enough money to defray expensive expenditure of studies because of their lucrative projects. A association would have several projects to prove great boons to their company and considered as back-up plans for the main strategy. Secondly and, their progress would be in process with high pace prior to omitting many administrative procedures. For example, if a team has ambition to study about new remedy for cancer, they must have the permission, which mainly prolong the time of research, from the laboratory management to the secretary of ministry of health.
Regardless of the benefits, there are bound to be those who doubt this proposal. Advocates of the former may think that there may be concerns about the quality of products produced by companies. In addition, they also support the idea that government could do researches with the observation of many experts, who follow to the manifold rules enacted by the ministry. However, the rules of ministry could circumscribe particular leaps of discoveries owing to the fact that there will comes to ideologies if there is no restriction. Moreover, individual companies possibly have several good financial packages to attract more experts to warrant the quality of their products, which also determine their success.
In conclusion, it is necessary to emphasize that the importance of individual associations is undeniable so the governments should not interfere in their business or even ban them of the field of science.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 66, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...lopment of life, opinion has divided on whether or not scientific study would be implemented a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 308, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'An' instead of 'A' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: An
...es because of their lucrative projects. A association would have several projects...
^
Line 3, column 484, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'come'
Suggestion: come
...eries owing to the fact that there will comes to ideologies if there is no restrictio...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.48453608247 147% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 4.92783505155 244% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.03092783505 363% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 32.9175257732 64% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 26.3917525773 186% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.85567010309 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 937.175257732 178% => OK
No of words: 308.0 206.0 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4025974026 4.54256449028 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 3.78020617076 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97080583339 2.54303337028 117% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 127.690721649 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.622605031667 98% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 290.88556701 178% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.41237113402 120% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.13402061856 44% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 16.3608247423 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.3455488699 44.8134815571 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 76.5299724578 167% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 16.8248392259 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 4.34317383033 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.49484536082 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14285922712 0.216113520407 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478441715405 0.0766984524023 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340187092039 0.0603063233224 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0783435963056 0.12726935374 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251263170405 0.0580467560999 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 8.37731958763 189% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 70.7449484536 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 7.45979381443 180% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 8.71597938144 165% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 7.59969072165 130% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 41.2886597938 242% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 8.62886597938 139% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 8.54432989691 131% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.