In some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this.
Nowadays, young people tend to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies. This trend clearly has both the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this.
To begin with, we will start discussing the advantages of this trend. One advantage is that it would help people learn how to manage your finances better so that they will know to save and allocate budget for various activities. Another advantage is that it would cultivate some soft skills for people. If you have some soft skills, then it will make a good impression with the employer. Last but not least, this trend makes people have a great time for life. They will have many unforgettable memories if they use the gap year right way.
On the other hand, there are some obvious disadvantages that would arise. First, a distraction from further studies may happen with people have a gap year. Some young people find that enjoyable and relaxing so that they decide to stop further studies. Secondly, the student who has a gap year may have a problem to readapt to an academic environment. They feel is better to continue a particular than a university course. Lastly, taking a gap year is a risk for many reasons. You can lose more than what you get from a gap year, but ultimately, it’s down to you.
In conclusion, there are plus point to this trend regard advantages one, two and three. However, we should think carefully about the disadvantage of it when we decide.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Nowadays, young people tend to work or travel for ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, then, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.48453608247 80% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 4.92783505155 223% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.03092783505 297% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 32.9175257732 85% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 26.3917525773 87% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1244.0 937.175257732 133% => OK
No of words: 261.0 206.0 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7662835249 4.54256449028 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.78020617076 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54554381399 2.54303337028 100% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 127.690721649 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582375478927 0.622605031667 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 381.6 290.88556701 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.13402061856 77% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6804123711 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 16.3608247423 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.2300068444 44.8134815571 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.1764705882 76.5299724578 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3529411765 16.8248392259 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64705882353 4.34317383033 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 7.41237113402 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.49484536082 334% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.441644799198 0.216113520407 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137073422229 0.0766984524023 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154699168166 0.0603063233224 257% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.302090659023 0.12726935374 237% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.268346027511 0.0580467560999 462% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 8.37731958763 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 70.7449484536 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 7.45979381443 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.79 8.71597938144 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 7.59969072165 97% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 41.2886597938 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 8.54432989691 94% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.