Some people say that University Students should pay full cost of their education. Others say that University education should be free. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Should University students be asked to bear the cost of education or should it be made free is a debate that has been lingering around since quite some time.
Many people believe that University education should be fully paid by the students itself, as it is something based on individual choice. It is the student who needs to decide whether they want to opt for further education or not. While others say, access to free education up to the basic education imparted to student is inadequate for employment and the overall development of the society.
In my opinion, free education is a right of the people, and if policies are worked out appropriately, is affordable to the government. It shall act as a great asset in the long run. Here I would like to elaborate my answer with reasons, why I strongly feel so.
Firstly, I would like to highlight that when education is linked with higher fees, the student would prefer not to partake streams of their likings but take admissions in courses which they can easily afford to pay. The perception of education will then turn from preference or natural talent to affordability and status of living. In most of the cases then, though the students may take admissions in the fields they are less interested in, but later the dropout rates of the colleges could increase due to lack of performance, leading o an overall imbalance. Also due to lack of funding the poor students may deprive themselves for further education leading to increase in unemployment and an indirect impact on the economies. While lack of funding leads to less educated students, this leads to lesser skilled people for the job markets
At the same time, if government can create more talented graduates by college funding, they would create of pool of entrepreneurs or skilled candidates for the growing markets who could contribute back to the society by creating new products or startups and offering more business and job opportunities to the fresher growing talents.We cannot ignore the long term benefit of a country for the short term gains done by revenues generated from college fees. The revenue invested in the free education can be regained by levying additional taxes on the graduates who have availed benefits from these policies.
I would hereby like to conclude that University fees should be waived of and education must be made free for graduates, with scholarships offered for highly talented students for the better growth and a faster economic development of the country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...eds to decide whether they want to opt. for further education, as a basic education...
^^^
Line 4, column 104, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an appropriate manner" with adverb for "appropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... the people, if policies are worked out in an appropriate manner, is affordable to the government and sh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 293, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Also
...ormance, leading o an overall imbalance.Also due to lack of funding the poor student...
^^^^
Line 8, column 293, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ormance, leading o an overall imbalance.Also due to lack of funding the poor student...
^^^^
Line 10, column 335, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: We
...tunities to the fresher growing talents.We cannot ignore the long term benefit of ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.48453608247 254% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 4.92783505155 406% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 5.05154639175 297% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.03092783505 396% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 32.9175257732 76% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 26.3917525773 265% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 25.0 3.85567010309 648% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2297.0 937.175257732 245% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 460.0 206.0 223% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99347826087 4.54256449028 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 3.78020617076 123% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78569377213 2.54303337028 110% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 127.690721649 189% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523913043478 0.622605031667 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 727.2 290.88556701 250% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.13402061856 88% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 8.0 1.83505154639 436% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 35.0 16.3608247423 214% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 144.070783064 44.8134815571 321% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 176.692307692 76.5299724578 231% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 35.3846153846 16.8248392259 210% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.92307692308 4.34317383033 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.29896907216 163% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 2.54639175258 196% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 7.41237113402 148% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221380130928 0.216113520407 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930300192073 0.0766984524023 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0917302431708 0.0603063233224 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127777398369 0.12726935374 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101832489923 0.0580467560999 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 8.37731958763 236% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 35.95 70.7449484536 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 3.82989690722 292% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 7.45979381443 227% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 8.71597938144 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 7.59969072165 124% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 41.2886597938 283% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 8.62886597938 139% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 8.54432989691 187% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.