The table graphs compare the sale of fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in term of five different nations, namely the UK, Switzerland, Denmark. Belgium and Sweden, over a period of five years.
Overall, Fairtrade coffee in the UK and bananas in Switzerland had a sharp increase from 1999 to 2004, while Sweden and Denmark witnessed a slight decrease in its bananas fair price figure.
In sales of fairtrade-labelled coffee, the figure for coffee in the UK was respondibled for 20 million of euros in 2004 as nearly 20 times as it was in 1999. Meanwhile, Switzerland Fairtrade coffee represented 6 million of euros in 2004.Besides, Sweden reached the lowest coffee fair price in 5 countries with 0.8 million in 1999 and 1 million in 2004. As can be seen that, there was a very minimal climb in this nation during a period of five years.
In second table, Switzerland was the country which had the highest sales of bananas with 15 million of euros in 1999 and 47 million of euros in 2004. Likewise, the UK and Belgium experienced a gentle rise with around 5 million. In contrast, the figure for Fairtrade bananas in Sweden and Denmark fell gradually in sequence from 1.8 and 2 to 1 and 0.9 million of euros.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ondibled for 20 million of euros in 2004 as nearly 20 times as it was in 1999. Me...
^^
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Besides
... represented 6 million of euros in 2004.Besides, Sweden reached the lowest coffee fair ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, likewise, second, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 5.05154639175 198% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 32.9175257732 12% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 26.3917525773 152% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 937.175257732 108% => OK
No of words: 211.0 206.0 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79146919431 4.54256449028 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.78020617076 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89708006998 2.54303337028 114% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 127.690721649 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497630331754 0.622605031667 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 292.5 290.88556701 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 16.3608247423 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.6820080603 44.8134815571 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.333333333 76.5299724578 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 16.8248392259 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 4.34317383033 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.94845360825 152% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207532345719 0.216113520407 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943527825668 0.0766984524023 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627364974517 0.0603063233224 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14688754845 0.12726935374 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034866321124 0.0580467560999 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 8.37731958763 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 70.7449484536 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 7.45979381443 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 8.71597938144 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 7.59969072165 101% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 41.2886597938 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 8.54432989691 131% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.