today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the sahara desert or the Antarctic.
What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places?
People, these days are exploring distinct and unique places on the earth which are still not yet seen by most of the individuals. It's human tendency to visit the beautiful places rather than visiting challenging geographic area. However, there is a rapid rise in the number of footfalls in such areas like the Sahara desert or the Antarctic. This essay will discuss about the pros and cons of travelling to these dangerous terrains.
In the first place, it will give you an immense view of the natural beauty as it is in it's pristine form because only a handful of wanderers have visited this place. Furthermore, these excrusions can support scientific research to map the uncharted species in these areas. In the recent survey by The Times, it is stated that the tourist intervention aided the scientific research to focus on the newly discovered fish in the southern part of the Antartica. It also helped the humans to get to know about the undiscovered vegetations which we can grow and eat as a part of our daily meal.
Regardless of its advantages, there are a few disadvantages with these trips. First of all, In such remote areas with exterme weather conditions the toursits can easily deteriorate their health because they are not accustom to such climate trends and sometimes may need an emergency medical service which will be unavailable. In addition, there will be limited supply of food and water which packers need to carry with them, therefore you can't go any further in the absence of any professional guides. Going to such places will definitely impact on the health of visitors.
In conclusion, there are benefits to explore the new places which makes you happier and help you to learn how to react in the extreme conditions. However, the prolong exposure to such places might influence your body to develop a disease which can be deadly. So I would like to append that visit places where you can readily find the medical services and enough food to survive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...avelling to these dangerous terrains. In the first place, it will give you an ...
^^^
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'accustomed'.
Suggestion: accustomed
...orate their health because they are not accustom to such climate trends and sometimes ma...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 440, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... need to carry with them, therefore you cant go any further in the absence of any pr...
^^^^
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...act in the extreme conditions. However, the prolong exposure to such places might influence...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.48453608247 147% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 4.92783505155 304% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.03092783505 297% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 32.9175257732 85% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 26.3917525773 197% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 937.175257732 176% => OK
No of words: 339.0 206.0 165% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85840707965 4.54256449028 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 3.78020617076 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60438734153 2.54303337028 102% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 127.690721649 153% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578171091445 0.622605031667 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 520.2 290.88556701 179% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.13402061856 77% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6804123711 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 16.3608247423 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.0581846061 44.8134815571 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.8 76.5299724578 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 16.8248392259 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 4.34317383033 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 2.54639175258 157% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.49484536082 268% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228353522977 0.216113520407 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738047940956 0.0766984524023 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590412674106 0.0603063233224 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135034456692 0.12726935374 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405416191608 0.0580467560999 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 8.37731958763 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 70.7449484536 81% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 7.45979381443 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 8.71597938144 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 7.59969072165 119% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 41.2886597938 223% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 8.62886597938 104% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 8.54432989691 126% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.