Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as Sahara desert or the Antarctic. What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places?
In present times, a large number of people are heading to the places which are inhabitable. This trend has both pros and cons and this essay will discuss them.
On the one hand, there are many advantages to visiting adventure places. Firstly, when one undertakes the toughest trip it boosts one’s abilities as well as one’s confidence. Even though, the tour can be tiresome physically and mentally, the euphoria that one experiences on completion cannot be described in words. Secondly, this kind of tourism teaches not only being self-reliant but also being a problem solver in robust conditions. For example, we all friends took a bike drive from Manali to Leh last year. During this journey, we all faced multiple obstacles which ultimately taught us to be self-dependent and multi-talented.
On the flip side, adventurous excursions can be extremely precarious. Things may not happen as planned in that travel. It has been observed by many experts that in pursuit of pleasure many backpackers take the high risk of their precious lives. As per the recent survey, 90 percent of people die while trekking Mount Everest as only a few have got success to reach the top peak of the mountain. This sort of trip may make them disabled for their rest of life. Sometimes, it happens that these adventurers are lost in robust places and for searching them governments have to incur huge money in rescue operations.
In conclusion, such a venturesome tour may either turn to be extremely thrilling or dangerous. Still, many people undertake such a journey to explore the unknown and taste their boundaries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 19, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
In present times, a large number of people are heading to the places which ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 458, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'we' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'friend'
Suggestion: friend
... robust conditions. For example, we all friends took a bike drive from Manali to Leh la...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, sort of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.48453608247 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 4.92783505155 142% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 32.9175257732 67% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 26.3917525773 114% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 937.175257732 144% => OK
No of words: 267.0 206.0 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04868913858 4.54256449028 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.78020617076 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78774488666 2.54303337028 110% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 127.690721649 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651685393258 0.622605031667 105% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 290.88556701 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.13402061856 77% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6804123711 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 16.3608247423 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3776766787 44.8134815571 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.25 76.5299724578 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6875 16.8248392259 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 4.34317383033 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 7.41237113402 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0696402574598 0.216113520407 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0233111499583 0.0766984524023 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0289059735434 0.0603063233224 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0459875378652 0.12726935374 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199351819977 0.0580467560999 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 8.37731958763 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 70.7449484536 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 7.45979381443 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 8.71597938144 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 7.59969072165 117% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 41.2886597938 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 8.62886597938 99% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 8.54432989691 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.