Some people think that giving aids to the poor countries has more negative impacts than positive ones To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Some people think that giving aids to the poor countries has more negative impacts than positive ones. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people believe that providing financial supports to impoverished countries has many adverse effects than beneficial ones. However, I opine that there are more benefits to it. In the following paragraphs, my opinion will substantiate with an example.

Firstly, it would lead those countries towards over-dependency on the rich countries and may stop them from making their efforts. Therefore, such help will hinder the long term progress of deprived countries. For instance, Pakistan is entirely relying on the financial assistance of developed countries such as America, China, and Russia, etc., which has obstructed the development of the country as compelled it to be reliant on them. Secondly, the financial relief given by the developed countries may go into corrupt hands and not reach those for whom it would need to be. Then, such assistance may not serve the purpose. For example, the need for the public may be food and clothes, but the money is used for building a bridge or something like that which may not satisfy the requirement of people.

There are manifold advantages in helping impoverished countries. We all know that all nations belong to a small global village and all problems which arise due to poverty, such such as crime, diseases, and terrorism may affect directly or indirectly to the rich countries. So, affluent countries are assisting in the less developed countries to save them from negative repercussions by protecting them from it they are protecting themselves. To exemplify it, America is financially supporting all the developing countries across the globe to fight with Novel Corona Virus Disease by doing that America is helping itself. So, it can be said that it is the necessity of affluent countries to save emerging countries to protect them.

To sump up, Developed countries must help underdeveloped countries. However, the prosperous country must do know what kind of help is required most.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: such
...ll problems which arise due to poverty, such such as crime, diseases, and terrorism may a...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, kind of, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86336187424 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567307692308 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6516789953 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.375 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11753435313 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.042774437356 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422878969538 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0863175099352 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296672788918 0.056905535591 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.