Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Certain sections of society believe that they can watch movies on their mobiles or laptops instead of watching them in a theater. However, other schools of thought think that one should watch pictures in a cinema to get full entertainment. I strongly opine that nothing can beat the thrill of watching it on the silver screen. This essay will discuss both the sides of argument along with my opinion.
There are certainly a few advantages of watching movies on electronic devices. Firstly, it provides mobility to the viewer because of this feature viewer can view any show on the go on his convenience. Another benefit of watching a movie on a gadget is that they can save money. Watching a movie in a cinema house cost an arm and a leg as it involves the expenses of a movie ticket, travel cost and also charges for refreshments like popcorn and drinks. As per a recent survey conducted by Times group, 60 percent of Indian tend to watch a movie on their devices because it is cheaper and flexible to them.
A recent survey conducted by the Indian Film Association shows that there are many more benefits to watching a movie in a theater. The audience gets a completely different experience in a movie hall. The cinema hall is fully equipped with the latest sound system and large screen which provides a lot of entertainment to the movie viewers. Furthermore, there are also some health benefits of watching a movie in a movie hall as watching them on a small screen for long hours can cause blurred vision, eyestrain and pain in neck and shoulders.
To sum up, watching movies on gadgets can be time and money-saving, but in the long run, it causes some health problems. On the other side, watching them in a theater is more enjoyable.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68506493506 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61426950466 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532467532468 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8584160916 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5333333333 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0951135118798 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373400828173 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0267267159202 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0691089484709 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0164894220757 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.