Some people say that E- books and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magazines to what extent do you agree or disagree.
Technology is flourishing by leaps and bounds and providing us new avenues while keeping us updated with the latest news and current affairs. Therefore, a fair amount of people believe, a conventional way of newspaper reading will be disappeared. I do not completely agree with this view.
On the one hand, there are multiple reasons why the traditional ways of getting news are still popular. First of all, reading newspapers has become an indispensable part of many people. They cannot start their day without reading a newspaper. Every class of society desperately waits for the newspaper and enjoys reading it with a cup of tea. Moreover, these are the portable, cheapest, and easiest way of knowing about national as well as global activities. It can be carried from one place to another in a bag and it is pocket friendly.
However, undeniably, the importance of technology cannot be neglected because reading newspapers online is not only time saving but also convenient. Secondly, digital books also have positive impacts on the environment. There are many drawbacks to reading digital books. Staring at a digital screen for a prolonged period of time would certainly cause eyestrain, headache, and blurry vision. Its long-term effects can be even worse. Moreover, it requires the consumption of electricity so reading e-books online is not cost-effective.
To conclude, the lives of people are drastically affected by advanced versions of the technology. But, in my opinion, it will not be able to pose a threat to the existence of traditional newspapers and magazines.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ing at a digital screen for a prolonged period of time would certainly cause eyestrain, headac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, while, as well as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1335.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23529411765 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9834195151 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.635294117647 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5217286512 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.5294117647 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135106948804 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.039491894415 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394883376318 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0870523114491 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382143694757 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.52 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.