Some people say that Ebooks and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magazines. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Technology is flourishing by leaps and bounds and providing us new avenues while keeping ourselves updated with the latest news and current affairs. Therefore, a fair amount of people believe, a conventional way of newspaper reading will be disappeared. However, I do not completely accord with it because a conventional newspaper is an easiest and cheapest way to get news.
To embark on, there are multiple reasons why the traditional ways of getting news are still popular. First of all, reading newspaper has become the ardent habit of many people. Everyone whether from affluent or middle class are seen desperately waiting for paper in morning and enjoy it reading with a cup of tea. Moreover, because It can be carried from one place to other in the bag and available at economical price, they are an easy way of knowing about the global activities. It is so handy and merely by continuing flip of pages can make you omniscient. Secondly, electricity and other appliances are not required. Additionally, the other attachments are like icing on the cake. For instance, the Hindustan times has multiple attachments like women’s fashion, career guide, culinary art and so on.
To contradict, undoubtedly, technology has given the radical approach to reading news as people can now read or get the news at the very instant with in-depth analysis. To demonstrate, videos provide a full and clear view to reading besides that people can download, share and forward it to their relatives and friends. Needless to say that techno phobic will be having no place in this ever-advanced modern world.
In recapitulation,the lives of people have been drastically affected by advanced versions of technology. Yet, in my opinion, it will not be able to pose threat to the existence of traditional newspaper and magazines.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-08-24 | ahmed ahmed | 73 | view |
2020-05-28 | Hero Devrani | 73 | view |
2020-04-28 | Jocelyn | 84 | view |
2020-03-08 | ziamuneeb | 89 | view |
2019-09-06 | Taeyeon Kim | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the town of Brindell and local areas in 1800 1900 and 2000 89
- The diagrams give information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies 78
- Being a celebrity such as a famous film star or sports personality brings problems as well as benefits.Do you think that being a celebrity brings more benefits or more problems? 61
- The table shoes the percentage of young people who were working in different sectors in one country in 2005 and 2010 78
- You have seen an advertisement in an Australian magazine for someone to live with a family for six months and look after their six year old child Explain why you would like the job Give details of why you would be suitable person to employ Say how you wou 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing with a cup of tea. Moreover, because It can be carried from one place to othe...
^^
Line 8, column 18, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...anced modern world. In recapitulation,the lives of people have been drastically a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13758389262 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96563238645 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620805369128 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3820217333 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6875 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137911224106 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419472334617 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392731296371 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0889273531539 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318224384891 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.