These days many countries help other countries by giving free food, medical, or other aid. What are the benefits and drawbacks of this for countries that give and receive?
International aid has played a paramount role between nations over the recent years. Many countries donate their necessities to other countries in order to create greater national relationships. This phenomenon leads to an amalgamation of merits and demerits depending on how it is being utilised
On the one hand,It is beneficial for the country which receives donations such as medication, food, and other necessities from other countries. For instance, developed countries often provide advanced medical resources for under-developed countries. In this case, for the recipient, substantial improvement of the health state could be seen owing to the better medication. On the other hand, the countries which provide the aid would benefit from the fact that it establishes better relationships between two countries. This often alleviates the international collision since these under-developed countries tend to be politically instability and they can repay in the future by providing raw materials which they might have in abundance.
On the other hand,there are drawbacks between the donor and recipient as well. The countries which provide the suppoprt have become developed due to the tax payers money and their citizens might oppose this notion of spending huge amount on money for other nations as they believe that their money should be used for their needs In such circumstance, it is detrimental to certain under-developed countries as In some instances, the receiving country starts depending on the other countries and are not really able to develop themselves which restricts their growth. Therefore they will continuously seek help from such nations.
In recapitulation , as argued above, it is undeniable that international aid is indispensable to the world. However, it also inflicts inequity between nations. It is imperative that authorities from predominant countries should reach an agreement to ensure the equity between countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts depending on how it is being utilised On the one hand,It is beneficial for the...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 16, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , It
...it is being utilised On the one hand,It is beneficial for the country which rec...
^^^
Line 5, column 18, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , there
... have in abundance. On the other hand,there are drawbacks between the donor and rec...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eir money should be used for their needs In such circumstance, it is detrimental ...
^^^
Line 5, column 411, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to certain under-developed countries as In some instances, the receiving country...
^^
Line 5, column 570, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...hemselves which restricts their growth. Therefore they will continuously seek help from s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 18, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... from such nations. In recapitulation , as argued above, it is undeniable that ...
^^
Line 7, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n agreement to ensure the equity between countries.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, really, so, therefore, well, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65084745763 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15989285343 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549152542373 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 112.143715908 49.4020404114 227% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 128.230769231 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353283729496 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117458018839 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881884846833 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203893735535 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807793149495 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.