Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance, such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a raging debate on whether wealthy countries should accept more refugees and give them basic amenities or not. In my opinion, it is the responsibility of the developed nations to accept refugees as long as it is due to valid reasons like war, natural disasters or legal immigration. I will in the below paragraphs elucidate both sides of the argument and give a relevant example on my opinion.
Nowadays since there is a huge economic parity between the rich and poor countries it becomes the responsibility of first world countries to accept refugees from third world countries in an event of war, natural disasters. In some instances, there are countries like Syria, Yemen and Afghanistan which have been war-torn for many years and refugees from these countries have been accepted by European countries like Germany, France and Belgium on humanitarian grounds and are being provided with basic assistance like food and housing. Similarly, in the era of globalization, we see new immigration policies from countries like Canada and Australia which have opened their doors to economic refugees who want to have a better quality of life. In recent news from CBS news Canada has a roadmap for One million immigrants in the next three years.
On the other hand as instead of accepting refugees from poor or war-torn countries rich countries as a part of bigger responsibility help poor countries by offering aid and monetary packages for the economic development of developing countries. In the recent past, many countries like the United States and Britain have provided aid to African countries which have reduced the influx of refugees from these countries. In the war-torn Afghanistan United States has helped the region to stabilize by providing military aid and India, however, has helped the country by being a partner in the economic development which helped the country to generate employment. A huge influx of refugees can have a negative impact on the social fabric and change the demography of that country. Recent examples can be seen from Europe where a heavy influx of refugees from Syria have brought instability in the region.
Thus, in my opinion, looking at the various examples mentioned above wealthier countries should not only accept refugees but also help in socio-economic growth of the developing nations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 846, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion immigrants in the next three years. On the other hand as instead of acceptin...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, similarly, so, third, thus, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.48453608247 147% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 4.92783505155 101% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 5.05154639175 337% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 32.9175257732 39% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 26.3917525773 246% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 3.85567010309 207% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1969.0 937.175257732 210% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 381.0 206.0 185% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16797900262 4.54256449028 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 3.78020617076 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78985710704 2.54303337028 110% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 127.690721649 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498687664042 0.622605031667 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 629.1 290.88556701 216% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.41237113402 120% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 1.44329896907 554% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 16.3608247423 177% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.0463655607 44.8134815571 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.461538462 76.5299724578 198% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3076923077 16.8248392259 174% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 4.34317383033 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.49484536082 268% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218815558215 0.216113520407 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088905175343 0.0766984524023 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831174064577 0.0603063233224 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143381618767 0.12726935374 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032447163253 0.0580467560999 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 8.37731958763 210% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 70.7449484536 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 3.82989690722 292% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 7.45979381443 212% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.3 8.71597938144 153% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 7.59969072165 118% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 41.2886597938 228% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 8.62886597938 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 8.54432989691 159% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 8.15463917526 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.