It is argued that rich nations around the world should take care of war affected migrants with basic amenities like food and shelter. This essay agrees with this idea because it is inhuman to keep affected people of other countries in barbarous conditions of refugee camps or jail while these people have the potential to be the active workforce of wealthy countries.
When people are bound to seek assistance to get rid of the war or riots that is going on in their home countries, developed countries should respond positively. First world nations are capable of providing shelter or food for the war affected refugees. If anyone is capable of helping others in their need, humanity should act to provide assistance to those who are helpless. Historically, we have seen a lot of wars and numerous count of refugee migration from the affected countries to rich countries. For example, war affected people from Syria are currently seeking protection in Canada and Canada government with all Canadians are now ready to sponsor families of Syria.
Rich countries often have shortage in the active workforce. Refugees from around the world are of different professions, and they are capable of filling the shortage on employees in different fields. When developed nations integrate immigrants with care into the mainstream resource pool, they will surely be benefited with further growth. For example, Japan and Russia have negative birth rate and each year they are falling short on active workforce. They can take policy to accept refugees and in turn fill the void in the field force.
In conclusion, war affected immigrants should be welcomed by first world countries because it would be inhuman to keep people in vulnerable state and also immigrants can contribute to the economic growth of hosting country.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.48453608247 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 4.92783505155 183% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 5.05154639175 218% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 32.9175257732 49% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 26.3917525773 189% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.85567010309 130% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 937.175257732 163% => OK
No of words: 296.0 206.0 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14527027027 4.54256449028 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.78020617076 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59531372002 2.54303337028 102% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 127.690721649 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530405405405 0.622605031667 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 469.8 290.88556701 162% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.13402061856 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 0.824742268041 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 16.3608247423 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.1679753172 44.8134815571 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.153846154 76.5299724578 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 16.8248392259 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53846153846 4.34317383033 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.49484536082 401% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.94845360825 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158026435524 0.216113520407 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582781686768 0.0766984524023 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032078372928 0.0603063233224 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0967276781013 0.12726935374 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446558144711 0.0580467560999 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 8.37731958763 170% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 70.7449484536 69% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 7.45979381443 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 8.71597938144 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 7.59969072165 111% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 41.2886597938 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 8.62886597938 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 8.54432989691 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 8.15463917526 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.