Dear Igor,
I feel the need to bring the issue that has been brought to light post the recent storms that had rocked the city of Chicago. Allow me to elaborate on the details.
As you know, there was a level 6 storm warning that had been doing rounds on the television and it was ordered by the city council to keep all the small pots and other small things inside the house which can hurt the public at large. I had followed the instructions and kept everything at a distance from the main entrance. However, the day storm had city, in the neighbourhood there were mountain stones and flower pots smashed onto the properties in the neighbourhood and as result, the glasses of the house are broken and the roof is severely damaged and has been dripping from the roof.
Further, the roof is leaking which is slowly creating a mess inside the house. The droplets are falling on the floor and in turn creating small holes which are making its way to the basement and has been rusting the heating unit. It is high time now to address the problem before it crosses the threshold limit.
As you know, the city council has still issued alert for subsequent storms to hit the city and as such I want you to address the issues that I am facing in the house and get it fixed in a short time period before things get worse. I hope you will empathize with my situation and act promptly.
I will be waiting for your action on the issue.
Yours faithfully,
Brad Jason
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 18, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ction on the issue. Yours faithfully, Brad Jason
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, still, i feel, you know
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.48453608247 200% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 4.92783505155 81% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 5.05154639175 238% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 32.9175257732 70% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 26.3917525773 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1204.0 937.175257732 128% => OK
No of words: 270.0 206.0 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45925925926 4.54256449028 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.78020617076 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25292372151 2.54303337028 89% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 127.690721649 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551851851852 0.622605031667 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 353.7 290.88556701 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.13402061856 66% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6804123711 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 16.3608247423 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.3152552932 44.8134815571 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.333333333 76.5299724578 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 16.8248392259 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 4.34317383033 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.49484536082 334% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115839208434 0.216113520407 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0360302456815 0.0766984524023 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348704668453 0.0603063233224 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0499641805389 0.12726935374 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313057476012 0.0580467560999 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 8.37731958763 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 70.7449484536 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 7.45979381443 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 8.71597938144 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 7.59969072165 102% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 41.2886597938 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 8.54432989691 126% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.