You have recently employed a plumber to do a job at a place you renovating, however, something went wrong with the work that created a problem for your project. Write a letter to the plumber and say– What was the problem?– How can it be fixed?– Sugg

Dear Sir,

The plumbing job done last weekend at Beverly 19th W has rendered problematic as of this morning. There has been leakage on the ceiling below and it is starting to propagate to the walls as well.

The newly installed pipes may have passed too close to the heated water conduits and that is causing loose joint, therefore leakage. I have shut off heater valves to subdue the problem. It has been partially helpful but should be reversed before 10 PM due to the cold.

Please fix this issue at the earliest possible time. In case of further damages to the unit below, us and consequently your company will be liable. It would especially be very expensive to reimburse any costs associated with electrical malfunctions due to the leakage.

Based on our contract, 6 other projects remain to complete in the upcoming 2 months. It would be highly recommended to ensure this issue does not arise in more units; otherwise, our continued partnership would be in jeopardy.

I anticipate seeing you again soon.

Yours faithfully,
Bob Smith

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 105, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommended ensuring'.
Suggestion: recommended ensuring
...e upcoming 2 months. It would be highly recommended to ensure this issue does not arise in more units...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, may, so, therefore, well

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 4.92783505155 122% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.03092783505 33% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 32.9175257732 49% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 26.3917525773 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.85567010309 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 882.0 937.175257732 94% => OK
No of words: 178.0 206.0 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95505617978 4.54256449028 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.78020617076 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63884723085 2.54303337028 104% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 127.690721649 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.724719101124 0.622605031667 116% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 290.88556701 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.13402061856 88% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6804123711 95% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 16.3608247423 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6405667744 44.8134815571 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.5 76.5299724578 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8333333333 16.8248392259 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58333333333 4.34317383033 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.49484536082 268% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136464700697 0.216113520407 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441929506968 0.0766984524023 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0256327473853 0.0603063233224 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0636940576578 0.12726935374 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0196105314948 0.0580467560999 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 8.37731958763 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 70.7449484536 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 7.45979381443 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 8.71597938144 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 7.59969072165 114% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 41.2886597938 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 8.62886597938 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 8.54432989691 89% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.