You recently organised an all-day event for your company, which took place in a local hotel. In their feedback , participants at the meeting said that they liked the hotel, but there were unhappy about the food that was served for lunch.
letter to a manager the hotel.
1. What participants liked about the hotel.
2. Explain why there were unhappy about the food
3. Suggest that manager should do about the food to improve.
Dear Sir or Madam,
I am a regular customer of your distinguished hotel at Worli. I frequently arrange events and meeting on behalf of my company ‘Fractal Analytics’. However, unlike other experiences, this one was quite disappointing for me as well as for my guests. Hence, I am writing this letter to show my dissatisfaction about the food served for lunch during the meeting event.
I would first like to tell you about the participant's positive response about the hotel. All the guests were pleased due to the ambience and overall service they received from the hotel staff. Rather they were enjoying the event.
However, according to the observation, the served food for lunch was undercooked. Additionally, some of the cuisines had pungent smell of garlic and onion, which was unacceptable.
By keeping the hotel’s previous services and reputation in mind we will not be going to provide any online negative feedback, but I request you to intervene and scrutinise this matter. Appropriate training to the chefs and supervision by an experienced and capable chef is required in this case, I suppose.
I look forward to hearing from you at the earliest.
Yours faithfully,
Teressa Helen.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-11 | Muhammad Saad Usmani | 73 | view |
- You recently organised an all-day event for your company, which took place in a local hotel. In their feedback , participants at the meeting said that they liked the hotel, but there were unhappy about the food that was served for lunch.letter to a manage 78
- Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. 73
- As more and more students enter universities, academic qualifications are becoming devalued. To get ahead in many professions, more than one degree is now required and in future it is likely that people will take a number of degree courses before even sta 78
- Some people think that when recruiting, companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others considered they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions. 73
- Some people think that parents have the greatest influence on their child’s academic development, while others think that a child’s teacher has more influence.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Dear Sir or Madam, I am a regular customer of your distingu...
^^^^
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...ice they received from the hotel staff. Rather they were enjoying the event. Howe...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 98, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...or lunch was undercooked. Additionally, some of the cuisines had pungent smell of garlic an...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, look, so, well, as for, i suppose, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.48453608247 94% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 4.92783505155 41% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.03092783505 33% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 32.9175257732 70% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 26.3917525773 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 937.175257732 111% => OK
No of words: 196.0 206.0 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28571428571 4.54256449028 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.78020617076 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10678259364 2.54303337028 122% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 127.690721649 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673469387755 0.622605031667 108% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 290.88556701 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.13402061856 88% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 16.3608247423 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7533545026 44.8134815571 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.6923076923 76.5299724578 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0769230769 16.8248392259 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 4.34317383033 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.49484536082 268% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363543556352 0.216113520407 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107771745557 0.0766984524023 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608347831627 0.0603063233224 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15903551749 0.12726935374 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787719764633 0.0580467560999 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 8.37731958763 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 70.7449484536 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 7.45979381443 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.81 8.71597938144 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 7.59969072165 120% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 41.2886597938 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 8.62886597938 99% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 8.54432989691 94% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.