Some people think History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that, in today’s world, subjects like Science and Technology are more important than History.
Academic cognition at an early age has become extremely crucial. Due to this, several people think that history is predominant subject. Whereas, proponents of the opposite thoughts believe that Science and technology must be comprehend the most by students. What must be the fundamental subjects in schools? A thorough scrutiny of the above will lead to an insightful response.
While it is convenient to adopt one side other the other, I prefer to present a balanced ergo objective assessment. In my opinion, analysis of historical subjects has its own pivotal role in academics. However, Science and Technology have their vital contribution in pupils future growth. Following two paragraphs will detail both the aspects extensively.
First and foremost, history plays an important part in our civilisation. This is because cultures and traditions are inherited from our ancestors with the study of History. Additionally, articles written by eminent writers in the past have been giving us tremendous information about our ancestors and how we would have evolved. For instance, the festivals, we are celebrating today have fascinating stories behind that and we came to know those through the historical materials.
On the contrary, study of Science and Technology gives students future growth. The world is being acquired by scientific facts and technological equipments. So, the importance of understanding these subjects, becoming necessity. For instance, in the era of globalisation, students must be aware of the technological devices and the science behind it from their childhood.
Keeping all of the above mentioned things in mind, historical events and cultural awareness are evident.
However, future growth perspective and competitions are well worthy of an equivalent consideration. To conclude, as is most of the things in life, this matter also has two sides. Fortunately, in this case, both of them are constructive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f understanding these subjects, becoming necessity. For instance, in the era of g...
^^
Line 9, column 9, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ind it from their childhood. Keeping all of the above mentioned things in mind, histori...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, well, whereas, while, for instance, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55218855219 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11411955348 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622895622896 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6540139647 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.5238095238 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1428571429 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.80952380952 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 3.4128256513 352% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205179457462 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519930596313 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578968245706 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0797317560838 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617097330612 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.