Some people get into debt by buying things they don’t need and can’t afford.
What are the reasons for this behaviour?
What action can be taken to prevent people from having this problem?
Over recent years, shopping industry has boomed all over the globe. Due to this, several people purchase unnecessary and unaffordable things. Eventually, these people fall short of money for other vital investments. What is causing this shortage of money? What could be the possible alternatives to reduce the spending? An extensive scrutiny of the above will lead to an insightful response.
Although we have had confronted an abundance of issues and their remedies until now, in this case, I would like to put forward a balanced ergo objective assessment. I opine, there are numerous causes for the debt phenomenon. However, there are some viable solutions to the identified causes. The subsequent two paragraphs will detail both aspects(constituents) extensively.
The foremost reason/cause is the thought of improving the standard of living. Additionally, most of the people feel superior by having materialistic objects, however, few of them feel confident. For instance, the University of London published an article which says that people with appropriate physical appearance generally outperforms than usual.
A possible resolution for the above challenges is understanding the fundamental requirements. The expenditure could be minimised by realising the importance of required materials such as food or education rather than an expensive smartwatch. For instance, Warren Buffet always suggests to minimise the unnecessary expense and save the money which could be utilised for near future enhancements.
Keeping all previously mentioned facts in mind, enhancing living standards is an evident component of our reality. On the other hand, approaches such as identifying mandatory needs and act accordingly could play a significant role. To conclude, there are sufficient(satisfactory) evidences for critical problems. However, there are adequate(sufficient) measures for the resolution of challenges.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 349, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arance generally outperforms than usual. A possible resolution for the above chal...
^^^
Line 6, column 48, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ble resolution for the above challenges is understanding the fundamental requirements. The expen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 278, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggests minimising'.
Suggestion: suggests minimising
...tch. For instance, Warren Buffet always suggests to minimise the unnecessary expense and save the mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cordingly could play a significant role. To conclude, there are sufficientsatisfa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, however, if, so, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.90647482014 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42559379105 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672661870504 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.8284924127 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2222222222 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4444444444 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174770382206 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529384187369 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449800290658 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0878330266387 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449868962773 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.87 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.7 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.57 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.