As more and more students enter universities, academic qualifications are becoming devalued. To get ahead in many professions, more than one degree is now required and in future it is likely that people will take a number of degree courses before even starting work. This is an undesirable situation.
Every passing day the number of students entering universities is significantly increasing leading to a reduction in the value of each academic degree. It has become a challenge in many fields that before starting their actual career, students require multiple university degrees. Unfortunately, the situation is likely to worsen in the near future. I believe, academic qualifications are loosing their values not only because of more students entering the universities but also due to a number of other reasons.
In schools, lack of guidance about the variety of fields available for a student to choose is one of the main reasons why all the students blindly select the commonly known fields. For instance, more than half of the students opt for either engineering or medical fields just because they are not aware of any other courses. This has resulted into devaluation of these professions. In these professions for a person to earn well, he has to clear so many degrees before starting his career. To illustrate, a doctor currently needs to study for an average 10 years, after his college, to start practicing.
Academic qualifications are also devalued because of the fact that so many new universities open every year. Because of so many available seats in each field, each pupil (majority of pupils)chooses the field blindly, as per (their)his liking, without giving importance to his (their)ability to sustain in that (their respective)field of work. This had led to devaluation of many academic branches. To overcome this issue, government should not allow new universities to open unless there is a requirement for the same.
In conclusion, schools and government need to take steps like providing required guidance to students for choosing their career according to their capabilities and not letting new universities open every year unnecessarily, respectively, to stop the future reduction in value of many academic qualifications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-27 | Prabhu Krishnan | 56 | view |
- Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result, people gravitate towards buying their products. What problems does this cause? What could be done to encourage people to buy local products? 68
- Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences. Others, however, believe there are better alternative ways of reducing crime. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
- Some people believe that all teenagers should have to do unpaid work during their free time in order to help the local community. They think this would benefit the teenagers doing the unpaid work but also society as a whole.Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Modern technology is now very common in most work places. How it has changed the way we work? Do you think there are disadvantages of relying too much on it. 84
- Some parents believe that child should not waste time by reading entertainment books but instead they should spend time to read educational books only. What is your opinion about this? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 43, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...ademic qualifications are also devalued because of the fact that so many new universities open every yea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, as to, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31493506494 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.101781258 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564935064935 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7849387266 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.928571429 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21428571429 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214878907217 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728229204746 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495494499327 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129037213871 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559318518152 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.