Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there will be less language in the world.
To what extent do you agree or disagree to this opinion
Languages are an indispensable part in human evolution and some of these languages are getting wiped out. Due to this, several people think that an extinction of these languages are not of that importance, rather it would be convenient to communicate with fewer languages around the globe. Proponents of the dissimilar thoughts believe in the pivotal role a language has been playing since ages. How these languages make differences in our life? A thorough scrutiny of the above will leave to an insightful response.
While it is convenient to adopt one side over the other, I prefer to present a balanced ergo objective assessment. In my opinion, there are adequate languages in the world to communicate and must not given priority to dying languages. However, there are some reasons why an old languages must be preserved. The following two paragraphs will detail both the aspects extensively.
First and foremost, the world has become a global village. So, as a result of gobalization, competitions are increasing in all countries. Having said that, less languages for communication make it simpler for businesses or oversees students to communicate effectively and efficiently with aboriginals. Otherwise, these people have to learn myriad of languages to be better than others as local speakers are considered closer than foreign language speaker. For instance, Quebec prefer to give a job to French speaker over english language speaker.
On the contrary, multiple languages represent the cultural diversity and how humans might have evolved till date. Myriad of languages make us curious about how could these ways of communication preserved the traditions we are following today. These old languages provide us information about the historical manuscripts and documents which eventually help us to know out ancestors in excellent manner. For instance, If we had not aware of the Modi script then we would not have known about the Mohenjodaro civilisation.
Keeping all of the above-mentioned facts in minds, benefits of common mode of communication is evident. However, studying history and human civilisation are well worthy of an equivalent consideration. In conclusion, as is most of the things in life, this matter has two sides. Fortunately, in this case, both of them are constructive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'language'?
Suggestion: language
...ever, there are some reasons why an old languages must be preserved. The following two pa...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun languages is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ing in all countries. Having said that, less languages for communication make it sim...
^^^^
Line 5, column 478, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Quebec) must be used with a third-person verb: 'prefers'.
Suggestion: prefers
... language speaker. For instance, Quebec prefer to give a job to French speaker over en...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...us curious about how could these ways of communication preserved the traditions w...
^^
Line 9, column 9, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...he Mohenjodaro civilisation. Keeping all of the above-mentioned facts in minds, benefit...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, then, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1953.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38016528926 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08896635617 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584022038567 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0903652352 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7727272727 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22727272727 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26353471554 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704329257311 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609419332026 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13914205466 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0739166661208 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.