A group of people regard an ancient knowledge more impressively than the modernize one. Alternatively, the considerably amount of people lean towards to be educated on technological degree. Personally speaking, I would say both arguments have validity, but my perception is close to the letter.
Nowadays, traditional part of people are willing to take a lesson from their ancestors and regarding it strongly. In addition, finding evidence about their origin and also maintaining extant culture are so vital for them. Granted, fundamental personalities such as behavior, communication and also characteristic are be subjected by this belief. For instance, elders tend to interact with youths in the traditional way and it stems from how they used to be educated which known as a compulsory lesson at the past.
On the other side of the argument, teenagers are enthusiastic about contemporary education as well as going under the surface about both cause and effect of scientific actions. Indeed, youths are so energetic and technology is being felt in every single part of their life for instance gadgets, car engine control unit and even solar energies. One of the benefits of modernization is about medical industry. Nowadays and even after civilization the population as well as global warming have been getting surprisingly increased and these bad circumstances lead many countries to provide a vital route to diminish worsening effects on human’s life. Consequently, youths tend to take a course up on a medical science to have an impact in illnesses which caused by pollution.
My own view is that although historical education increases experience about threatening situations, Either scientific or technological degree are more impressive and it should be widespread among youths. To my mind, this is what makes the world such an interesting place.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ncient knowledge more impressively than the modernize one. Alternatively, the considerably am...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...mmunication and also characteristic are be subjected by this belief. For instance,...
^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bout both cause and effect of scientific actions. Indeed, youths are so energetic...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, regarding, so, thus, well, even so, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41438356164 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14696586636 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640410958904 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5665857245 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.928571429 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129875441329 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440694329314 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375190219034 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0835263590859 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503199100752 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.