Nowadays, plenty of film directors tend to represent violent movies which have a roughly scene at there. Consequently, it would have a harmful impact on people specially children. From my point of view, I lean towards people’s perception and some violent actions should be diminished.
First and foremost, lack of regulation on movie programs gives rise these kind of movies to be accessible either for matures or youths. Indeed, fighting scenes for children might have a destructive effect on them. For instance, these platforms provoke teenagers and will be imitated by them particularly at educational atmosphere. Also, plenty of severe controversies will be occurred due to these circumstances.
Furthermore, Full consensus has been available among people that these kinds of trivial movies, whether is the latest blockbuster or not, put a strain on some useful films in order to be seen. Granted, it’s so conspicuous that drama films as well as the academic ones stimulate children’s brain and knowledge and also devoid of them would have just deteriorates the situation.
It stands to reason that the most responsibilities goes back to the government which provides more regulation in order to restrict violent films to be created. Alternatively, having an access to these movies should be limited by putting an age range. On the other hand, teenagers can’t distinguish between the real and hypothetical fight scenes. In this case, government should fosters a compulsory lesson in school to increase the sense of distinction to cope with this issue.
Overall, it can be seen that films directors don’t care too much about communication safety. The most impressive attribute throughout this issue would be a well-done management on them which prevents society to expose bad experiences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('roughly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('scene') instead of another adjective.
... to represent violent movies which have a roughly scene at there. Consequently, it would have a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...regulation on movie programs gives rise these kind of movies to be accessible either for m...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 183, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
...ms to be created. Alternatively, having an access to these movies should be limited by pu...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 384, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'foster'
Suggestion: foster
...scenes. In this case, government should fosters a compulsory lesson in school to increa...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, so, well, for instance, kind of, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4628975265 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09922397174 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65371024735 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0312780708 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.066666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128636504972 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0447317734568 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0296255770685 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0739362729053 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0118535251418 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.