Dear Patty,
I hope you are doing well. It was great catching up with you last week over coffee. I remember we had discussed about you offering me to work as the Chief Technical Officer at your travel company.
While I am humbled by your gesture, I would like to assert that my work profile aligns towards project management rather than technical development. As you are aware, I have been working in project management for the last 7 years and have an expertise in starting and managing projects from the scratch. Hence, the position offered is a misfit for my skills and competency.
Thank you but I would have to decline your offer as I am not the right fitment for the requisite role. I would be happy to refer my friends who are already working on similar profile and would be interested in taking up this role. Let us catch up next week so we could discuss more on this.
Best Regards,
Amber
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 4.92783505155 101% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 32.9175257732 82% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 26.3917525773 72% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.85567010309 130% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 748.0 937.175257732 80% => OK
No of words: 164.0 206.0 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56097560976 4.54256449028 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.78020617076 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40503759427 2.54303337028 95% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 127.690721649 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.670731707317 0.622605031667 108% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 290.88556701 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.13402061856 66% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 1.44329896907 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 16.3608247423 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9335862411 44.8134815571 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.8 76.5299724578 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4 16.8248392259 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7 4.34317383033 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28821079739 0.216113520407 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100544949015 0.0766984524023 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858725805521 0.0603063233224 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196309511192 0.12726935374 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467427298197 0.0580467560999 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 8.37731958763 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 70.7449484536 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 7.45979381443 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.87 8.71597938144 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 7.59969072165 105% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 41.2886597938 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 8.54432989691 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.