6. Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
People have different views about whether governments should give people who are doing creative jobs money for supporting their work. In my opinion, some artists do need financial assistance from the government because it is unrealistic for them to find other help.
It is extremely hard for creative artists to support themselves or meet a suitable sponsor. On the one hand, artists cannot seek other jobs when they face financial pressure because what they are doing is normally time-consuming. Clothe designers, for example, spend days and nights drawing out their ideas, tailoring clothes and searching for buyers. They devote all their energy to the career and have no time for other jobs. On the other hand, most of the companies and businessmen who are willing to invest money to the creative industry are seeking for potential profits. That way, designers or composers sometimes have to change their styles and cater to the market.
It seems to me that the best way to support artists is governments subsidy. First and foremost, the government have the responsibility to help people who cannot support themselves to have reasonable living standards, in which artists are eligible for the funding. Secondly, the money from states provides boarder space for artists to create freely so that artworks will not turn into tedious repetitions and more masterpieces may pop up in the market. Finally, great artists will pay back in the future with a huge amount of benefits. Tourism, for instance, may boost up due to some famous painter or musician’s studio, bringing significant revenues for the country.
In conclusion, governments should allocate some of their budgets to help artists since some people working in this area hardly support themselves and the investment can benefit the country in the future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23208191126 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68229422811 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580204778157 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8528968823 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259447478033 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936050350247 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727332343131 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183339600266 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760117815785 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.