According to a recent study, the more time people use the Internet, the less time they spend with real human beings. Some people say that instead of seeing the Internet as a way of opening up new communication possibilities world- wide, we should be concerned about the effect this is having on social interaction.
How far do you agree with this opinion?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.
Firstly, Internet decreases the distance between people virtually, what I mean by this is that family members who live away can connect to phone calls or messages. However, with the growing interest of people to social interactions, mobile chat applications display interesting pages and feeds on their homepages, which further takes people time. For example, The number of users on Facebook surged, after the introduction of the news feed page. Many people get distracted easily over the internet, they often come online for one task and gets involved into another area. Physical interactions between friends is getting effected as it is now completely online.
Notably, a decade ago people used to buy newspapers for current affairs and news, nonetheless, with the increase of internet users, many find it as the easiest and the cheapest way to get notified. However, they are not realizing about the interactions and meetings with people, which they used to have, while they go to buy a magazine. Furthermore, family members who used to share things are now busy chatting online, this can cause a decline in the relationships. In addition to this, with the increase of virtual gaming mania, youth are getting addicted to these games. Hence, modern children lack the ability to find friends easily.
To sum up, although internet open doors to worldwide communication, extensive use of it can affect relationships. Everyone should understand the drawbacks like the distraction and deterioration of physical presence. In my opinion, humans should enjoy moments with family through travelling or by talking instead of browsing for connections across the world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun find seems to be countable; consider using: 'many finds'.
Suggestion: many finds
...s, with the increase of internet users, many find it as the easiest and the cheapest way ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...pest way to get notified. However, they are not realizing about the interactions and meetings wit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, nonetheless, so, while, for example, i mean, in addition, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34980988593 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82820221232 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650190114068 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4134704251 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.230769231 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2172806964 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643580595755 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511051586518 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143807228003 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0133511170082 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.