Advances in technology and automation have reduced the need for manual labor. Therefore, working hours should be reduced. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Advances in technology and automation have reduced the need for manual labor. Therefore, working hours should be reduced. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, due to advancement in technology and automatic machines, manual labour work has been minimized in Industries. So, it is argued by some people that working hours should be reduced to increase profitability. However, I disagree with this because it will lead to many issues.

One of the major issues, Unemployment ratio, which is already high in all the countries of the world. In other words, lessening working hours in industries, which result in a reduction in staff and increasing the employment ratio overall. Hence, these jobless people may either commit crimes in society or get indulge in any kind of illegal activities to get money for their survival.

The second reason is that automation has made the sedentary life of humans as well as making them machine dependents which is decreasing their thinking ability. Moreover, the majority of the jobs are performed by the machines, which are computer operated and require less human efforts. Consequently, health issues such as obesity, back pain, diabetes and so on, are being escalated day by day.

Lastly, if we decrease working hours by introducing automatic machines in companies to reduce staff than they may get frustrated because they will get less wage and their focus will be minimized towards their work, which may increase accident cases in industry and it is not only threatening for the family members but also devastating for the companies progress.

In conclusion, rather than reducing the working hours we should change a portfolio by giving additional required training which will plummet unemployment and elevate job satisfaction and a healthy lifestyle.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, lastly, may, moreover, second, so, well, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as well as, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30152671756 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80256912196 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641221374046 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.7490275062 49.4020404114 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.272727273 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8181818182 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1818181818 7.06120827912 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183203216961 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672478272207 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618374455771 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105405097807 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710908313991 0.056905535591 125% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.