The increasing need for a universal language, which is widely acceptable by the majority, has been striking recently because of the benefits it can bring into our life. However, some may argue that the appearance of a global language, such as English could undermine the traditional and cultural values of many countries. Personally, I think that it is wise to be able to use one single communication tool for different purposes, and I will tell the reason why in this essay.
Let's start by looking at how convenient a single language was, if it would be used by every individuals on the planet. As we have known previously, the intrinsic cultural values rooted in every languages are often overlooked and neglected in the translation process, which can amount to communication breakdown. For example, one word can lose its original meaning if it is translated from the indigenous language to another language and vice versa. Not only using English comes in handy with the translation process, can it promote the information and commodity exchange among nations. The world today is characterized by successive interactions and growing interdependence between countries, where people from different cultures, thinking and lifestyles gather together to do business. There is no place for regional isolation and absolute national sovereignty. Obviously, an international language can solve all the problems.
On the other hand, it is argued that a global language could bring into dire consequences on each country. If a notion of a single language could be achieved, there would be a disappearance of a great number of other languages. This is taken into account as a great loss in terms of tradition and cultural values. While "Americanization" is threatening the preservation of the indigenous values, young people around the world tend to celebrate more Western special occasions, such as Valentine's Day or Halloween, than their conventional occasions.
In conclusion, there are heated controversies among whether accepting English as a global language is reasonable or not. Though, I think that the major drawbacks can not outweigh the benefits, and considering English as a widely accepted communication medium is a good move for any country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...l tell the reason why in this essay. Lets start by looking at how convenient a si...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, may, so, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1909.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36235955056 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30412907868 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587078651685 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3333286496 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.3125 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143598183129 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467877775137 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437776743019 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0872536272779 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432341938212 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.