Aircraft have been increasingly used to transport fruits and vegetables to some countries where such plants hardly grow or are out of season. Some people consider it a good trend, but some people oppose it. Discuss both the views and give your opinion.
Over the past decade, the increasing demand on transporting fruits and vegetables throughout the world never ceased to draw public attention and provoke debates. Some may support that airfreight is also an economical means to meet the above needs while others give an opposite argument toward its costly price and negative effects caused by using it as a method on export and import of agricultural products. To the best of my knowledge, I’m of the opinion that this is an immensely debatable question to be analyzed in both contrary aspects before concluding that supporting air transportation is reasonable and practical.
On the one hand, it is important to recognize that carrying perishable items such as fruits and vegetables facilitates the countries which couldn’t grow such kinds of plants, out of the situation of famine or shortage of very essential crops. One real case is that some nations in Africa area often lack instrumental foods, leading to inadequate nutrition, but thanks to planes, the non-profit government organizations (NGOs) in the world can aid regardless of the far distance that no other transportation means can adapt to this mission, excluding aircraft. This example indicates that shipping farming products by flights is a virtual bridge to connect throughout the world and not only boost the agricultural industry but also prevent the food supply crisis, especially in some countries facing the scarcity of victuals/viands resources.
Additionally, it is visible to realize that taking advantage of delivering fruits and vegetables by airplanes is an opportunity for exchanging other commodities, and based on that, the world economy has become commercialized and globalized. For instance, the USA is one of the largest countries in importing vegetables from Vietnam while Vietnam has been importing electronic devices with a huge amount per year from the USA under bilateral agreements which actually bring advantageous points for Vietnam in trade. This example shows that freight by planes has been a beneficial trend in order to foster comprehensively economic development, especially in agrarian areas like Vietnam.
On the other side, some opponents may argue that using planes as a means of carrying goods easy to rot is pricy because of preservation cost for such products with short shelf life. This leads to an increase in the price of these products which the poor countries couldn’t be affordable to prevent starvation in their sites. Besides that, there is an emerging and extreme statement that the idea of using aircraft as a mode of transport can make air traffic congested and air space polluted. However, they are ignorant of the fact that nowadays, due to the development of the aviation industry, more cheap airline brands have been established to serve the transportation purpose. Meanwhile, compared to both congestion and air pollution level caused by other vehicles as motorbikes, ships,…, transporting by flights can reduce pressure on tackling these above problems which have been extremely severe and likely to be unsolved on the ground.
In conclusion, under no circumstances, should people underestimate the benefit of airline transportation for fruits and vegetables. Not only does it help to prevent starvation but also makes a foundation for global economic development. However, we shouldn’t ignore the relevant influences like increasing of goods price or polluting the air environment which can not surpass/outweigh its mentioned-above advantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'supports'.
Suggestion: supports
...attention and provoke debates. Some may support that airfreight is also an economical m...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 841, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... scarcity of victuals/viands resources. Additionally, it is visible to realize t...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 789, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...d by other vehicles as motorbikes, ships,…, transporting by flights can reduce pre...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, however, if, may, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 7.30460921844 260% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 82.0 41.998997996 195% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2988.0 1615.20841683 185% => OK
No of words: 547.0 315.596192385 173% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46252285192 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83611736076 4.20363070211 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11401691666 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 301.0 176.041082164 171% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550274223035 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 922.5 506.74238477 182% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.3533936634 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 175.764705882 106.682146367 165% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1764705882 20.7667163134 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58823529412 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22145062707 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624780125251 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0303167032906 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111993798043 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373124803803 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 13.0946893788 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.98 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 165.0 78.4519038076 210% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.78957915832 199% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.