Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development
There have been immense advances in technology in most aspects of people's lives, especially in schools and businesses. People; therefore, digitalizing learning and working become widespread. In my opinion, this is a positive development which supports students to learn in all conditions and is the solution to the enterprises in the new normal.
On the one hand, international students can acquire knowledge without spending plenty of money. For instance, learners can stay at home remotely earning an online degree will reduce accommodation costs. This helps people with budget restraints reach their study abroad dreams as well as the most up-to-date education. Moreover, thank to the characteristics of an online learning portal, students can update information or be noticed easier and faster. It is thus significantly convenient for everyone as it would ensure the undergraduates keep up with the lessons by recording study sessions.
On the other hand, as the affection of the post-pandemic effect, many companies consider remote working as a solution for protecting health and saving costs. For example, the facility costs would be reduced if fewer people worked at the workplace so the corporation can make more profit. Additionally, from the human resources perspective, the networked operation is a big opportunity to find talented employees all over the world. As a result, the employment rate may increase because everyone is flexible in finding jobs and able to work from different places.
In conclusion, I believe that technology brings a positive impact on people's activities such as its affordable and popular facilitating company and school operation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...re profit. Additionally, from the human resources perspective, the networked operation is...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53696498054 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10028596706 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673151750973 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.4146675257 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.461538462 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7692307692 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8461538462 7.06120827912 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166677632919 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0484626971649 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0292269073322 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0845317657222 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397405589182 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.