Art is considered an essential part of all cultures throughout the world. However, these days fewer and fewer people appreciate art and turn their focus to science, technology and business. Why do you think that is? What could be done to encourage more people to take interest in arts?
Art is considered a crucial part of national culture all around the world. Many people think that there is no future for art and science and technology should be concentrated on, and many reasons leave behind, and some solutions should be taken to increase interest in arts careers.
The primary reason why science and technology are more appreciated than art careers is the unavailability of jobs for artists. Art is considered as a hobby rather than a professional job and helps alleviate stress after working. Also, some think that doing a masterpiece or a painting is time consuming and invaluable. In contrast, in the development of technology and science, science and technology have more potential to reach job qualifications, have a higher standard of living. For example, many multinational companies and high-ending jobs mostly look for candidates who are enlightened in scientific methods as they deal with an array of technological advancements. As a result, this trend pushes the artistic skills backwards in the job.
It seems to me that governments and individuals should take some measures to change their mindset as they should realize without the arts. First and foremost, governments should increase awareness among all generations by organizing various workshops, programs galvanizing people to appreciate the arts. Or paying more for the artists due to their talents and contribution to preserve this kind of art is a great idea. Therefore, people are aware of the heritage buildings sites, and the arts connect to the history in the past and help in creating revenue for their country. Nevertheless, parents should encourage their kids to pursue their artistics careers in lieu of preventing them.
To sum up, science, technology, and business are lucrative in terms of job prospects, but art too can be a reliable source of livelihood. Thus, the government’s efforts can facilitate the survival of art as it is the only way to keep our culture and traditions alive for future generations.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, for example, in contrast, kind of, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23148148148 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0626911942 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570987654321 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8166058394 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279117183438 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914674830059 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624832597818 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166112321001 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626004668328 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.