Art is generally perceived as a crucial part of a community and also the works of art provide significant insights of existing cultures. I am totally in favour of the art education playing a pivotal role for children. I believe that kids ought to be taught to lay equal emphasis on art and other subjects such as science, math and so on. This essay will discuss two benefits of integrating the art education and put forward a logical reason about why students should not be discouraged to prioritise other subjects.
One of the major advantages of including art teachings in a school curriculum is that it helps in the development of motor skills because the motions and techniques employed in creating art require fine tuned motor abilities. This can be well illustrated by swirling of a paintbrush, colouring between several lines and erasing small details of a drawing, which all necessitate unique concentrations and steady hand movements. Not only would drawing different shapes and cutting papers enhances overall dexterity but also youngsters would prove remarkably more precise and accurate.
Secondly, generation of absolute confidence is another benefit of providing art learnings. Take visual arts for example that is normally egocentric. In other words, when a child draws or paints, it is the result of expression of themselves and how juveniles think. Therefore, if teachers and folks promote the desire in youths to perform conceptual art by complementing their works, displaying the pictures in an exhibition, presumably, this kind of task will upgrade the morale of children as well as the personal developments. Next, courses such as math and science provide hands on and minds on lessons for learners, which have been proven highly instrumentals for carving out a glittering career in the future.
In conclusion, it is clear that spare subjects remain as imperative as an art subject. In addition, giving the art education remains a truly fundamental task because of augmentation of an innovative approach and determinations.
Essay evaluation report
Not only would drawing different shapes and cutting papers enhances overall dexterity
Not only would drawing different shapes and cutting papers enhance overall dexterity
flaws:
Need one paragraph for 'Do you think children should be encouraged to focus on art rather than other subjects?'
Can you re-write this essay?
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 4 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 328 350
No. of Characters: 1686 1500
No. of Different Words: 207 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.256 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.14 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.929 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 133 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 111 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 75 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 50 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.429 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.926 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.786 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.312 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.539 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.033 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'draw'
Suggestion: draw
...d steady hand movements. Not only would drawing different shapes and cutting papers enh...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26219512195 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.021924398 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637195121951 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4640970431 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.285714286 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92857142857 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317303012618 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101872582406 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503970296999 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177959085379 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648973312169 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.